Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182642›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: The PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frank Pianka, Pascal Probst, Anne-Valerie Keller, Daniel Saure, Kathrin Grummich, Markus W Büchler, Markus K Diener

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Stoma-associated complications-Prevention strategy and treatment concepts].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Article
  13. Synthetic Mesh in Contaminated Abdominal Wall Surgery: Friend or Foe? A Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Review
  14. [Prophylaxis of parastomal, perineal and incisional hernias in colorectal surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  15. Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: technique and outcomes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Principles and parallels of prevention and repair of parastomal hernia with meshes].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank PiankaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal ProbstDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anne-Valerie KellerStudy Center of the German Surgical Society, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel SaureInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kathrin GrummichStudy Center of the German Surgical Society, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus K DienerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParastomal hernia (PH) is the most common complication after ostomy formation. Prophylactic mesh placement may be effective in reducing the rate of PH at the stoma site. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize the evidence with regard to the safety and effectiveness in comparison with the standard procedure without mesh placement and to identify important risk constellations.

methodA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library with no language or date restrictions. Randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) were included. The main outcomes of interest were PH (primary outcome) rate and stoma-related complications (secondary outcomes) such as stenosis or fistula. Statistical analysis included meta-analyses of pooled data and subgroup analyses.

resultsEleven trials (eight RCTs; three nRCTs) with a total of 755 patients were included. PH rate varied from 0% to 59% in the intervention and from 20% to 94% in the control group. RCTs showed a significant reduction of PH rate in the mesh group (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.58, p = 0.034), whereas included nRCTs did not. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complication rates. Subgroup analyses showed superiority of non-absorbable meshes and sublay mesh positioning in open surgery.

conclusionProphylactic mesh placement is safe and reduces PH rate. A recommendation for prophylactic non-absorbable meshes in a sublay position can be made for patients undergoing open colorectal operations with end-ostomies. Further research endeavors should focus on patient-oriented outcomes, not only PH rate, with respect to tailored treatment in specific patient populations.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesHerniaHumansOstomyPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Mesh

Identifiers

PMID28182642
PMCPMC5300283
OpenAlexW2586092123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.