Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182632›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Clinical outcomes of patients with and without diabetes mellitus after hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qingshan Li, Yue Wang, Tao Ma, Yi Lv, Rongqian Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Postoperative Liver Failure: Definitions, Risk factors, Prediction Models and Prevention Strategies.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingshan LiShaanxi Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yue WangShaanxi Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Tao MaShaanxi Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yi LvShaanxi Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Rongqian WuShaanxi Center for Regenerative Medicine and Surgical Engineering, Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical data regarding the influence of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy are conflicting. To determine the impact of DM on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy, we systematically reviewed published studies and carried out a meta-analysis.

methodsA systematic literature search of Pubmed, Sciencedirect, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Database was conducted from their inception through February 2, 2016. The combined relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was calculated.

resultsA total of 16 observational studies with 15710 subjects were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that DM significantly increased the risk of overall postoperative complications (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; P<0.001), DM-associated complications (RR 1.8; 95% CI 1.29-2.53; P<0.001), liver failure (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.3-3.76; P = 0.028) and post-operative infections (RR 1.59; 95% CI 1.01-2.5; P = 0.045). In addition, DM was also found to be significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival and disease free survival after liver resection. The pooled HR was 1.63 (95% CI 1.33-1.99; P<0.001) for overall survival and 1.55 (95% CI 1.07-2.25; P = 0.019) for disease free survival.

conclusionDM is associated with poor outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy. DM should be taken into account cautiously in the management of patients undergoing hepatectomy. Further prospective studies are warranted to explore effective interventions to improve the poor outcomes of diabetic patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHepatectomyHumansLiver FailureObservational Studies as TopicPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID28182632
PMCPMC5300262
OpenAlexW2587613497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.