Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182483›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)2017

Characterization of vocalizations emitted in isolation by California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) pups throughout the postnatal period.

Sarah A Johnson, Michele S Painter, Angela B Javurek, Claire R Murphy, Emily C Howald, Zoya Z Khan, Caroline M Conard, Kristal L Gant, Mark R Ellersieck, Frauke Hoffmann and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of sound production in deer mice (Peromyscus spp.).The Journal of experimental biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Maturation of Social-Vocal Communication in Prairie Vole (Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah A JohnsonBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Michele S PainterBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Angela B JavurekBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Claire R MurphyBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Emily C HowaldBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Zoya Z KhanBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Caroline M ConardBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Kristal L GantBond Life Sciences Center and Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri.
Mark R EllersieckAgriculture Experimental Station-Statistics, University of Missouri.
Frauke HoffmannDepartment of Ecophysiology and Aquaculture, Leibniz- Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
A Katrin SchenkDepartment of Physics, Randolph College.
Cheryl S RosenfeldUniversity of Missouri Columbia.

Funding

MU PREP Scholars programR25GM064120 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Daniel T. Bergstralh, JOHN D DAVID · 2002 to 2026
$5.8M
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Epigenetic Alterations, and Autism-Like Behaviors in the Highly Social California Mouse ModelR01ES025547 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROBERTS, R. MICHAEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Effects of Bisphenol A on Maternal and Paternal Behaviors of California MiceR21ES023150 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ROSENFELD, CHERYL SUSAN · 2014 to 2015
$397k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025547NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES023150NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM064120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodent species, such as monogamous and biparental California mice, produce vocalizations as a means of communication. A temporal examination of vocalizations produced by California mice pups in isolation was performed. Pup recordings were performed for 3 min at ∼10.00 and 14.00 hrs on early postnatal days (PND) 2-4, 7, 21, and 28. Once initial recordings were finished, pups were returned to the home cage with parents and any siblings for 5 minutes to determine if active biparental responses resulted in an enhanced vocalization response when pups were isolated and retested. We also sought to determine whether potential reduction in vocalizations by older pups might be due to procedure-habituation procedure associated with less anxiety and/or possibly decreased need for parental care. Vocalizations were measured in weanling (30 days of age) "naïve" pups not previously isolated. Results show older pups took significantly longer to vocalize, indicated by increased latency before producing their initial syllable compared to earlier ages. With increasing age, pups demonstrated decreased syllable duration, reduced number and duration of phrases, and decreased number of syllables per phrase. No differences in pup vocalizations were observed before and after being placed back with parents, suggestive biparental potentiation may not exist in California mice pups. Comparison of the naïve to habituated weanling pups indicated the former group had more total calls but no other differences in vocalization parameters were detected between these 2 groups. Collectively, the findings suggest that as California mice pups mature and approach weaning they generally vocalize less in isolation. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornBehavior, AnimalVocalization, AnimalAnimalsCaliforniaMicePeromyscusSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID28182483
PMCPMC5310764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.