Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182469›Full record

ReviewPsychiatric rehabilitation journal2017

Health behavior models for informing digital technology interventions for individuals with mental illness.

John A Naslund, Kelly A Aschbrenner, Sunny Jung Kim, Gregory J McHugo, Jürgen Unützer, Stephen J Bartels, Lisa A Marsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychiatric rehabilitation journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John A NaslundDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College.
Kelly A AschbrennerDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Sunny Jung KimDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Gregory J McHugoDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Jürgen UnützerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
Stephen J BartelsDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College.
Lisa A MarschCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College.

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CenterU48DP005018 · DP · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ADACHI-MEJIA, ANNA MARIA · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
ACL HHS U48DP005018Center for Technology and Behavioral HealthHealth Promotion Research CenterNCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005018NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTheoretical models offer valuable insights for designing effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions, yet the application of theory for informing digital technology interventions for people with mental illness has received limited attention. We offer a perspective on the importance of applying behavior theories and models to developing digital technology interventions for addressing mental and physical health concerns among people with mental illness.

methodIn this commentary, we summarize prominent theories of human behavior, highlight key theoretical constructs, and identify opportunities to inform digital health interventions for people with mental illness. We consider limitations with existing theories and models, and examine recent theoretical advances that can specifically guide development of digital technology interventions.

resultsEstablished behavioral frameworks including health belief model, theory of planned behavior, transtheoretical model, and social cognitive theory consist of important and overlapping constructs that can inform digital health interventions for people with mental illness. As digital technologies continue to evolve and enable longitudinal data collection, real-time behavior monitoring, and adaptive features tailored to users' changing needs over time, there are new opportunities to broaden our understanding of health behaviors and mechanisms of behavior change. Recent advances include dynamic models of behavior, persuasive system design, the behavioral intervention technology model, and behavioral models for just-in-time adaptive interventions. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Behavior theories offer advantages for guiding use of digital technologies. Future researchers must explore how theoretical models can effectively advance efforts to develop, evaluate, and disseminate digital health interventions targeting individuals with mental illness. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeModels, TheoreticalBiomedical TechnologyHumansMental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID28182469
PMCPMC5550360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.