ArticleJournal of cytology
Evaluation of thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III on FNAC.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A Machine Learning-Based Model for Preoperative Assessment and Malignancy Prediction in Patients with Atypia of Undetermined Significance Thyroid Nodules.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Thyroid Nodules with Nondiagnostic and Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2024Article
- Assessment of Preoperative TSH Serum Level and Thyroid Cancer Occurrence in Patients with AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance: What radiologists need to know.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Review
- The Correlation of Age with Prognosis of Atypia of Undetermined Significance and Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Nodules.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Indian experience of AUS/FLUS diagnosis: is it different from rest of Asia and the West?-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Gland surgery · 2020Article
- The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology.Gland surgery · 2020Article
- The Usefulness of Immunocytochemistry of CD56 in Determining Malignancy from Indeterminate Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2018Article
- Thyroid Cytology in India: Contemporary Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2017Review
- Malignancy Rates of Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS) Cases: A Tertiary Center Study.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Bethesda (BSRTC) category III has been ascribed a malignancy rate of 5-15%, however, the probability of malignancy remains variable.
aimTo evaluate category III with respect to its rate and risk of malignancy and substratify it. SETTINGS AND
designAtypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) percentage, cytohistological correlation, and risk of malignancy were analyzed and substratification was done. MATERIAL AND
methodsCategory III cases over a 2-year period were analyzed retrospectively. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Two-tailed Fisher exact test, with a level of significance set at 0.05, was performed for data analysis.
resultsOf 1169 thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNAs), 76 (6.5%) were category III. A total of 48 patients had follow up; 24 patients underwent surgery, 12 repeat FNA, and 12 were clinically followed. Repeat FNA cytology was unsatisfactory in 8.3%, benign in 66.7%, AUS in 8.3%, and follicular neoplasm in 16.7%. Of the 24 operated, 8 (33.3%) were malignant (follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma), 5 (20.8%) were follicular adenomas, and 11 (45.8%) were non-neoplastic. Among all AUS/FLUS nodules with follow-up, malignancy was confirmed in 16.7% (8/48) whereas with nodules triaged to surgery only, the malignancy rate was 33.3% (8/24). Substratification into categories of "cannot exclude PTC" and "favor benign" helped detect malignancy better, as 85.7% cases in the first subcategory (
conclusionThough the rate of Category III in our study is in accordance to BSRTC, the risk of malignancy in AUS/FLUS nodules is higher. Substratification of AUS/FLUS may help better patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.