Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28181418›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2017

Mathematical modeling of the effects of CK2.3 on mineralization in osteoporotic bone.

A Lisberg, R Ellis, K Nicholson, P Moku, A Swarup, P Dhurjati, A Nohe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A LisbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
R EllisDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
K NicholsonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Deleware, USA.
P MokuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
A SwarupDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
P DhurjatiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
A NoheDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.

Funding

Mechanism of a mimetic peptide CK2.3 on bone formationR01AR064243 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI NOHE, ANJA G · 2013 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is caused by decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and new treatments for this disease are desperately needed. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) is crucial for bone formation. The mimetic peptide CK2.3 acts downstream of BMP2 and increases BMD when injected systemically into the tail vein of mice. However, the most effective dosage needed to induce BMD in humans is unknown. We developed a mathematical model for CK2.3-dependent bone mineralization. We used a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to derive the CK2.3 concentration needed to increase BMD. Based on our results, the ideal dose of CK2.3 for a healthy individual to achieve the maximum increase of mineralization was about 409 µM injected in 500 µL volume, while dosage for osteoporosis patients was about 990 µM. This model showed that CK2.3 could increase the average area of bone mineralization in patients and in healthy adults.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalAdultBone DensityBone Morphogenetic Protein 2HumansOsteoporosisPeptide FragmentsTreatment OutcomeBMP2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Peptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID28181418
PMCPMC5351412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.