Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2017
People with epilepsy obtain added value from education in groups: results of a qualitative study.
Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to implementation of epilepsy self-management programs: a systematic review using qualitative evidence synthesis methods.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Trial
- What matters most to people living with epilepsy? A rapid review of qualitative research relating to health outcomes.Epilepsia · 2025Review
- Not Just a Headache: Qualitative Study About Web-Based Self-Presentation and Social Media Use by People With Migraine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Views of People With Epilepsy About Web-Based Self-Presentation: A Qualitative Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeHaving epilepsy requires individuals to learn about self-management. So far, trials of self-management courses have not included in-depth qualitative evaluations of how the learning method influences participants' perceptions and behaviour. We aimed to interview participants who had attended a course, as part of a randomized controlled trial, to examine: (i) their perceptions of what they valued and negative aspects of the intervention, and (ii) whether and in what ways they continued to make use of the training.
methodsTwenty participants were selected within 6 months of undertaking a course from the larger randomized controlled trial conducted in England. Semi-structured interviews were based on a topic guide.
resultsParticipants' characteristics were representative of the clinical and demographic characteristics of the trial group. Their mean age was 44 years, half were male, and three-quarters had had epilepsy for over 10 years and had experienced one or more seizures in the previous month. Participants valued the opportunity to meet 'people like them'. Structured learning methods encouraged them to share and compare feelings and experience. Specific benefits included: overcoming the sense of 'being alone' and improving self-acceptance through meeting people with similar experience. Over half reported that this, and comparison of attitudes and experience, helped them to improve their confidence to talk openly, and make changes in health behaviours.
conclusionsPeople feel socially isolated in long-term poorly controlled epilepsy. They gain confidence and self-acceptance from interactive groups. Expert-facilitated courses that encourage experiential learning can help people learn from each other, and this may enhance self-efficacy and behaviour change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.