Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28181343›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2017

Apparent diffusion coefficient values may help predict which MRI-detected high-risk breast lesions will upgrade at surgical excision.

Safia Cheeney, Habib Rahbar, Brian N Dontchos, Sara H Javid, Mara H Rendi, Savannah C Partridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A multiparametric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. DWI in the Assessment of Breast Lesions.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Safia CheeneyDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Habib RahbarDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brian N DontchosDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sara H JavidDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mara H RendiDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Savannah C PartridgeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Validation and Standardization of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker in Breast CancerR01CA207290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2017 to 2022
$2.2M
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Detection and Characterization of Breast LesionsR01CA151326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARTRIDGE, SAVANNAH CORRINA · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151326NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features could assist in determining which high-risk lesions identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) will upgrade to malignancy on surgical excision. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective study included participants with MRI-detected Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions with high-risk pathology on CNB who underwent surgical excision. Twenty-three high-risk lesions detected on 3T breast MRI in 20 women (average age = 54 ± 9 years) were evaluated, of which six lesions (26%) upgraded to malignancy at surgery. DCE, DWI characteristics, and clinical factors were compared between high-risk lesions that upgraded to malignancy on surgical excision and those that did not. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify features that optimally predicted upgrade to malignancy, with performance described using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsHigh-risk lesions that upgraded on excision demonstrated lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) than those that did not (median, 1.08 × 10

conclusionADC and maximum lesion size on MRI show promise for predicting which MRI-detected high-risk lesions will upgrade to malignancy at surgical excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1028-1036.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAdultAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRiskContrast Mediaapparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)atypiabreastdiffusion weighted imaging (DWI)dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRIhigh-risk lesions

Identifiers

PMID28181343
PMCPMC7263072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.