Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28181156›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

The significance of post-stress decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients undergoing regadenoson stress gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Javier Gomez, Yasmeen Golzar, Ibtihaj Fughhi, Adebayo Olusanya, Rami Doukky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prognostic value of early left ventricular ejection fraction reserve during regadenoson stress solid-state SPECT-MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Prognostic value of absent left ventricular ejection fraction reserve with regadenoson SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. The prognostic implications of ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in patients undergoing regadenoson stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. The diagnostic and prognostic value of near-normal perfusion or borderline ischemia on stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. The prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease: The largest cohort to date.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  10. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Prognostic value of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Do we need a new definition for post-stress reduction in LVEF beyond the numerical values?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Validation of a clinical pathway to assess asymptomatic renal transplant candidates using myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in an era of decreasing frequency of myocardial ischemia during myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Fully automated analysis of perfusion data: The rise of the machines.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Deciding wisely: A case for an effective use of myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier GomezDivision of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W. Harrison St., Suite # 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Yasmeen GolzarDivision of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W. Harrison St., Suite # 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ibtihaj FughhiDivision of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Adebayo OlusanyaDivision of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W. Harrison St., Suite # 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rami DoukkyDivision of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1901 W. Harrison St., Suite # 3620, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. rdoukky@cookcountyhhs.org.
John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County · USRush University Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe significance of post-stress decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with regadenoson stress gated SPECT (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has not been studied. METHODS AND

resultsConsecutive patients who underwent rest/regadenoson stress GSPECT-MPI followed by coronary angiography within 6 months were analyzed. Change in LVEF by GSPECT-MPI was calculated as stress LVEF minus rest LVEF; a significant decrease was tested at 5% and 10% thresholds. In a diagnostic cohort of 793 subjects, LVEF change was not predictive of severe/extensive coronary artery disease (area under the curve, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.57; P = 0.946). There was no significant difference in the rates of severe/extensive coronary artery disease in patients with or without a decrease in LVEF, irrespective of MPI findings. In an outcome cohort of the 929 subjects followed for 30 ± 16 months, post-regadenoson stress decrease in LVEF was not associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction or in the risk of coronary revascularization.

conclusionsIn patients selected to undergo coronary angiography following regadenoson stress GSPECT-MPI, a decrease in LVEF after regadenoson stress is not predictive of severe/extensive CAD or adverse clinical outcomes, irrespective of MPI findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPurinesPyrazolesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftPurinesPyrazolesregadenosoncoronary artery diseasediagnosisejection fractionMyocardial perfusion imagingprognosisregadenoson

Identifiers

PMID28181156
OpenAlexW2586128340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.