ArticleHeart and vessels2017
Intracardiac impedance after cardiac resynchronization therapy is a novel predictor for worsening of heart failure.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biotronik Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Measurement of Intrathoracic Impedance: A Report of Two Cases.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2024Article
- Improved heart failure by Rhein lysinate is associated with p38MAPK pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrathoracic impedance measured by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies because several factors other than pulmonary congestion may affect this parameter. Therefore, we hypothesized that changes in intracardiac impedance between the right and left ventricular leads would be more accurate to identify worsening heart failure in patients with CRT. The study enrolled 21 patients with CRT defibrillator (15 males, 70 ± 12 years). During the follow-up period (12 ± 7 months), the subjects experienced 37 fluid index threshold (60 ohm-days) crossing events. These events were divided into two groups whether hospitalization due to worsening heart failure was required (group-H, n = 14) or not (group-NH, n = 23). Based on the intracardiac impedance at the beginning of increasing fluid index (BI) and the crossing of 60 ohm-days (CI), the rate of impedance change (BI-CI/BI) was estimated. Then, the time elapsed from BI to CI (T) was evaluated. We calculated the rate of intracardiac impedance change per day (BI-CI/BI × T) in each group. The rate of intrathoracic impedance change per day was also determined using the same method. The median rate of intracardiac impedance change per day was 0.27 (IQR 0.22-0.54) %/day in group-H, and 0 (IQR 0-0.08) %/day in group-NH with a significant difference (P < 0.0001), whereas the rate of intrathoracic impedance change per day was similar between the two groups. By receiver operating characteristic curve for identification of hospitalization due to worsening heart failure, the best cutoff value of the rate of intracardiac impedance change per day was 0.20%/day (sensitivity 92%, specificity 88%, and AUC 0.98). In contrast, the best cutoff value of the rate of intrathoracic impedance change per day was 0.19%/day (sensitivity 86%, specificity 43%, and AUC 0.68). These results suggest that increased rate of change of decreasing intracardiac impedance measured by CRT is a novel useful predictor for worsening heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.