Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28180319›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Challenges of CRISPR/Cas9 applications for long non-coding RNA genes.

Ashish Goyal, Ksenia Myacheva, Matthias Groß, Marcel Klingenberg, Berta Duran Arqué, Sven Diederichs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Roles of long non-coding RNAs in oesophageal cancer pathogenesis.International journal of experimental pathology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Emerging Roles of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Cardiovascular Diseases.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish GoyalDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Ksenia MyachevaDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias GroßDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcel KlingenbergDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Berta Duran ArquéDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sven DiederichsDivision of RNA Biology & Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system provides a revolutionary genome editing tool for all areas of molecular biology. In long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) research, the Cas9 nuclease can delete lncRNA genes or introduce RNA-destabilizing elements into their locus. The nuclease-deficient dCas9 mutant retains its RNA-dependent DNA-binding activity and can modulate gene expression when fused to transcriptional repressor or activator domains. Here, we systematically analyze whether CRISPR approaches are suitable to target lncRNAs. Many lncRNAs are derived from bidirectional promoters or overlap with promoters or bodies of sense or antisense genes. In a genome-wide analysis, we find only 38% of 15929 lncRNA loci are safely amenable to CRISPR applications while almost two-thirds of lncRNA loci are at risk to inadvertently deregulate neighboring genes. CRISPR- but not siPOOL or Antisense Oligo (ASO)-mediated targeting of lncRNAs NOP14-AS1, LOC389641, MNX1-AS1 or HOTAIR also affects their respective neighboring genes. Frequently overlooked, the same restrictions may apply to mRNAs. For example, the tumor suppressor TP53 and its head-to-head neighbor WRAP53 are jointly affected by the same sgRNAs but not siPOOLs. Hence, despite the advantages of CRISPR/Cas9 to modulate expression bidirectionally and in cis, approaches based on ASOs or siPOOLs may be the better choice to target specifically the transcript from complex loci.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCell LineGene Knockdown TechniquesGene TargetingGenome, HumanHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansModels, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA InterferenceRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID28180319
PMCPMC5388423
OpenAlexW2524784061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.