Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28180056›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2017

Patterns and predictors of sitting time over ten years in a large population-based Canadian sample: Findings from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Klaus Gebel, Sarah Pont, Ding Ding, Adrian E Bauman, Josephine Y Chau, Claudie Berger, Jerilynn C Prior, CaMos Research Group

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sedentary behaviour surveillance in Canada: trends, challenges and lessons learned.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Klaus GebelCentre for Chronic Disease Prevention, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield, Queensland 4878, Australia; School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, 33 Berry St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia; Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Sarah PontNew South Wales Ministry of Health, 73 Miller St, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia.
Ding DingPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, 14-88 McGregor Road, Smithfield, Queensland 4878, Australia.
Adrian E BaumanPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Josephine Y ChauPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Claudie BergerCaMos National Coordinating Centre, McGill University Health Center, 3801 University Street, Pavilion Ross R4-76, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.
Jerilynn C PriorCentre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research, Medicine/Endocrinology, University of British Columbia, The Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Room 4111, 4th Floor, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
CaMos Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to describe patterns and predictors of sedentary behavior (sitting time) over 10 years among a large Canadian cohort. Data are from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, a prospective study of women and men randomly selected from the general population. Respondents reported socio-demographics, lifestyle behaviors and health outcomes in interviewer-administered questionnaires; weight and height were measured. Baseline data were collected between 1995 and 1997 (n = 9418; participation rate = 42%), and at 5- (n = 7648) and 10-year follow-ups (n = 5567). Total sitting time was summed across domain-specific questions at three time points and dichotomized into "low" (≤ 7 h/day) and "high" (> 7 h/day), based on recent meta-analytic evidence on time sitting and all-cause mortality. Ten-year sitting patterns were classified as "consistently high", "consistently low", "increased", "decreased", and "mixed". Predictors of sedentary behavior patterns were explored using chi-square tests, ANOVA and logistic regression. At baseline (mean age = 62.1 years ± 13.4) average sitting was 6.9 h/day; it was 7.0 at 5- and 10-year follow-ups (

Indexed as

Cohort studyPopulation-based cohortPredictorSedentary behaviorTrend

Identifiers

PMID28180056
PMCPMC5292755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.