ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016
Examining Health Care Students' Attitudes toward E-Professionalism.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reclaiming the concept of professionalism in the digital context: a principle-based concept analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- Re-opening Pandora's box: Who owns professionalism and is it time for a 21st century definition?Medical education · 2023Review
- Social media use habits, and attitudes toward e-professionalism among medicine and dental medicine students: a quantitative cross-sectional study.Croatian medical journal · 2021Article
- Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Exploring influences on pharmacists' and students' ethical reasoning in a changing practice landscape in Australia.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Article
- Perceptions of e-professionalism among dental students: a UK dental school study.British dental journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.