Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28179575›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Key Lessons Learned from Moffitt's Molecular Tumor Board: The Clinical Genomics Action Committee Experience.

Todd C Knepper, Gillian C Bell, J Kevin Hicks, Eric Padron, Jamie K Teer, Teresa T Vo, Nancy K Gillis, Neil T Mason, Howard L McLeod, Christine M Walko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Todd C KnepperDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Gillian C BellPersonalized Medicine Program, Mission Health, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
J Kevin HicksDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Eric PadronDepartment of Hematologic Malignancies, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jamie K TeerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Teresa T VoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of South Florida College of Pharmacy, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Nancy K GillisDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Neil T MasonDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Howard L McLeodDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA Howard.McLeod@Moffitt.org.
Christine M WalkoDeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing practicality of genomic sequencing technology has led to its incorporation into routine clinical practice. Successful identification and targeting of driver genomic alterations that provide proliferative and survival advantages to tumor cells have led to approval and ongoing development of several targeted cancer therapies. Within many major cancer centers, molecular tumor boards are constituted to shepherd precision medicine into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn July 2014, the Clinical Genomics Action Committee (CGAC) was established as the molecular tumor board companion to the Personalized Medicine Clinical Service (PMCS) at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida. The processes and outcomes of the program were assessed in order to help others move into the practice of precision medicine.

resultsThrough the establishment and initial 1,400 patients of the PMCS and its associated molecular tumor board at a major cancer center, five practical lessons of broad applicability have been learned: transdisciplinary engagement, the use of the molecular report as an aid to clinical management, clinical actionability, getting therapeutic options to patients, and financial considerations. Value to patients includes access to cutting-edge practice merged with individualized preferences in treatment and care.

conclusionsGenomic-driven cancer medicine is increasingly becoming a part of routine clinical practice. For successful implementation of precision cancer medicine, strategically organized molecular tumor boards are critical to provide objective evidence-based translation of observed molecular alterations into patient-centered clinical action. Molecular tumor board implementation models along with clinical and economic outcomes will define future treatment standards.

Indexed as

GenomicsFemaleHumansMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineCancerLessons learnedMolecular tumor boardPersonalized medicinePrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID28179575
PMCPMC5330702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.