Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28179574›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2017

Association Between Tumor Progression Endpoints and Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Monica Ter-Minassian, Sui Zhang, Nichole V Brooks, Lauren K Brais, Jennifer A Chan, David C Christiani, Xihong Lin, Sylvie Gabriel, Jérôme Dinet, Matthew H Kulke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica Ter-MinassianDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sui ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nichole V BrooksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lauren K BraisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jennifer A ChanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David C ChristianiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xihong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sylvie GabrielIpsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Jérôme DinetIpsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Matthew H KulkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA matthew_kulke@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USIpsen (France) · FRHarvard University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
Molecular and Genetic Analysis of Neuroendocrine Tumor Risk and SurvivalR01CA151532 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KULKE, MATTHEW H · 2011 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151532NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endpoints related to tumor progression are commonly used in clinical trials of novel therapeutic agents for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Whether improved tumor control translates into improved overall survival (OS), however, is uncertain. We assessed associations between tumor progression endpoints and OS in observational cohorts of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogs or with everolimus. We identified 440 patients with advanced NET who had received treatment with single-agent somatostatin analogs and 109 patients treated with everolimus, all of whom were treated at our institution and were evaluable for both tumor progression and survival. We assessed associations between progression-free survival (PFS) and OS by using the Kendall tau test, and we assessed associations between tumor progression and OS by using a landmark analysis. In the 440 patients treated with somatostatin analogs, we observed a significant correlation between PFS and OS by using the Kendall tau test (0.31;

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsSurvival AnalysisLandmark analysisNeuroendocrine tumorsOverall survivalProgression‐free survivalSomatostatin analogs

Identifiers

PMID28179574
PMCPMC5330705
OpenAlexW2587129213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.