Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28179571›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals.

Aurélie Kapusta, Alexander Suh, Cédric Feschotte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 242 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
242citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

242 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. T2T genomes ofGenome research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

182 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aurélie KapustaDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.ORCID 0000-0002-4131-903X
Alexander SuhDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8979-9992
Cédric FeschotteDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; cedric@genetics.utah.edu.

Funding

Human DNA transposons: evolutionary history and genomic impactR01GM077582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2007 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size in mammals and birds shows remarkably little interspecific variation compared with other taxa. However, genome sequencing has revealed that many mammal and bird lineages have experienced differential rates of transposable element (TE) accumulation, which would be predicted to cause substantial variation in genome size between species. Thus, we hypothesize that there has been covariation between the amount of DNA gained by transposition and lost by deletion during mammal and avian evolution, resulting in genome size equilibrium. To test this model, we develop computational methods to quantify the amount of DNA gained by TE expansion and lost by deletion over the last 100 My in the lineages of 10 species of eutherian mammals and 24 species of birds. The results reveal extensive variation in the amount of DNA gained via lineage-specific transposition, but that DNA loss counteracted this expansion to various extents across lineages. Our analysis of the rate and size spectrum of deletion events implies that DNA removal in both mammals and birds has proceeded mostly through large segmental deletions (>10 kb). These findings support a unified "accordion" model of genome size evolution in eukaryotes whereby DNA loss counteracting TE expansion is a major determinant of genome size. Furthermore, we propose that extensive DNA loss, and not necessarily a dearth of TE activity, has been the primary force maintaining the greater genomic compaction of flying birds and bats relative to their flightless relatives.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsDNADNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenomeGenome SizeGenomicsMammalsPhylogenyDNADNA Transposable ElementsamniotesDNA lossflightgenome size evolutiontransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID28179571
PMCPMC5338432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.