Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28179476›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Disharmony in neural oscillations.

Alexandre Hyafil

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measuring spectrally-resolved information transfer.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre HyafilIdibaps, Barcelona, Spain alexandre.hyafil@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-651X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-frequency phase coupling (PPC) may play an important role in neural processing and cognition. However, a new study unveils a statistical bias in how PPC is detected in neural recordings, questions prior evidence for PPC in hippocampus, and shows PPC tests are dramatically flawed by their confounds with oscillation harmonics.

Indexed as

HippocampusTemporal LobeCognitioncross-frequency couplinghippocampusoscillationssynchrony

Identifiers

PMID28179476
PMCPMC5494360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.