Consumption of artificial sweeteners in pregnancy increased overweight risk in infants.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Food additives in childhood: a review on consumption and health consequences.Revista de saude publica · 2022
   Review
2. Aspartame-True or False? Narrative Review of Safety Analysis of General Use in Products.Nutrients · 2021
   Review
3. Low-energy sweeteners and body weight: a citation network analysis.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2021
   Review
4. Noncaloric Sweeteners in Children: A Controversial Theme.BioMed research international · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Association Between Artificially Sweetened Beverage Consumption During Pregnancy and Infant Body Mass Index.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as