Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178956›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Translation and validation of the 12-item Oxford knee score for use in Finland.

Aleksi Reito, Anni Järvistö, Esa Jämsen, Eerik Skyttä, Ville Remes, Heini Huhtala, Mika Niemeläinen, Antti Eskelinen

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aleksi ReitoCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland. aleksi.reito@fimnet.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6903-6461
Anni JärvistöCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Esa JämsenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Eerik SkyttäCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Ville RemesPihlajalinna Group, Kehräsaari B, 33200, Tampere, Finland.
Heini HuhtalaSchool of Medicine, University of Tampere, Lääketieteen yksikkö (Arvo), Lääkärinkatu 1, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Mika NiemeläinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Biokatu 6b, 33520, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe focus in the reporting of results after total knee replacement (TKR) has changed from surgeon/radiologist-based scores to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The questionnaires used in subjective outcome are often originally published in English and need to be validated in different languages. The aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Finnish language version of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS-S) questionnaire.

methodsThe original OKS questionnaire was translated using a forward/backward protocol. The OKS-S questionnaire was sent to 225 patients who were scheduled to undergo TKR surgery. The assessment was repeated 1 year after the index operation. Half of the patients also received the RAND-36 questionnaire with the OKS-S questionnaire and the other half the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire. 30 patients twice received the OKS-S questionnaire preoperatively for the test-retest assessment.

resultsFeasibility was acceptable with a response rate of 96% in both pre- and postoperative assessments. Correlation between OKS-S questionnaire and all domains of the KOOS questionnaire and the physical domains in the RAND-36 questionnaire was high, and confirmed both good criterion and convergent validity. Content validity was good since no ceiling or floor effect was observed. In the test-retest assessment, all but 2 patients were within the 95% limits of agreement. Responsiveness was large according to effect sizes.

conclusionsOur data suggests that the OKS-S questionnaire is suitable for the assessment of both the preoperative status and the outcome of TKR in Finnish speaking patients.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsOxford knee scorePatient reported outcome measurementTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID28178956
PMCPMC5299663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.