Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178930›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

The 5As team patient study: patient perspectives on the role of primary care in obesity management.

Jacqueline Torti, Thea Luig, Michelle Borowitz, Jeffrey A Johnson, Arya M Sharma, Denise L Campbell-Scherer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. 'Beyond the Scale': A Qualitative Exploration of the Impact of Weight Stigma Experienced by Patients With Obesity in General Practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Community Jury on initiating weight management conversations in primary care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline TortiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Clinical Research Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E1.
Thea LuigDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Clinical Research Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E1.
Michelle BorowitzDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H4.
Jeffrey A JohnsonSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E3.
Arya M SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E1.
Denise L Campbell-SchererDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Clinical Research Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2E1. denise.campbell-scherer@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 60% of people have overweight or obesity, but only a third report receiving counselling from primary care providers. We explored patients' perspectives on the role of primary care in obesity management and their experience with existing resources, with a view to develop an improved understanding of this perspective, and more effective management strategies.

methodsQualitative study employing semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, with a sample of 28 patients from a cohort of 255 patients living with obesity and receiving care to support their weight management in a large Primary Care Network of family practices in Alberta.

resultsFour illustrative themes emerged: (1) the patient-physician relationship plays an important role in the adequacy of obesity management; (2) patients have clear expectations of substantive conversations with their primary care team; (3) complex conditions affect weight and patients require assistance tailored to individual obesity drivers; (4) current services provide support in important ways (accessibility, availability, accountability, affordability, consistency of messaging), but are not yet meeting patient needs for individual plans, advanced education, and follow-up opportunities.

conclusionsPatients have clear expectations that their primary care physician asks them about weight within a supportive therapeutic relationship. They see obesity as a complex phenomenon with multiple drivers. They want their healthcare providers to assess and address their root causes - not simplistic advice to "eat less, move more". Patients felt that the current services were positive resources, but expressed needs for tailored weight management plans, and longer-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Physician's RoleAdultAlbertaBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedObesityObesity ManagementPatient Care TeamPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareFamily medicineObesityPrimary health careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28178930
PMCPMC5299769
OpenAlexW2586282254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.