ArticleBMC nephrology2017
Latent variable modeling improves AKI risk factor identification and AKI prediction compared to traditional methods.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00791648 (Short-term Atorvastatin's Effect on Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short-term Atorvastatin's Effect on Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Trial
- Predicting acute kidney injury in septic shock patients using inflammatory indices in the intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Development Trajectory and Influencing Factors of Depression in Patients With Cervical Cancer During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2025Article
- Unsupervised clustering reveals phenotypes of AKI in ICU COVID-19 patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- A prediction model of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury based on antithrombin III.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is diagnosed based on postoperative serum creatinine change, but AKI models have not consistently performed well, in part due to the omission of clinically important but practically unmeasurable variables that affect creatinine. We hypothesized that a latent variable mixture model of postoperative serum creatinine change would partially account for these unmeasured factors and therefore increase power to identify risk factors of AKI and improve predictive accuracy.
methodsWe constructed a two-component latent variable mixture model and a linear model using data from a prospective, 653-subject randomized clinical trial of AKI following cardiac surgery (NCT00791648) and included established AKI risk factors and covariates known to affect serum creatinine. We compared model fit, discrimination, power to detect AKI risk factors, and ability to predict AKI between the latent variable mixture model and the linear model.
resultsThe latent variable mixture model demonstrated superior fit (likelihood ratio of 6.68 × 10
conclusionsA latent variable mixture model better fit a clinical cohort of cardiac surgery patients than a linear model, thus providing better assessment of the associations between risk factors of AKI and serum creatinine change and more accurate prediction of AKI. Incorporation of latent variable mixture modeling into AKI research will allow clinicians and investigators to account for clinically meaningful patient heterogeneity resulting from unmeasured variables, and therefore provide improved ability to examine risk factors, measure mechanisms and mediators of kidney injury, and more accurately predict AKI in clinical cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.