Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178912›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2017

Do medical students receive training in correct use of personal protective equipment?

Amrita John, Myreen E Tomas, Aditya Hari, Brigid M Wilson, Curtis J Donskey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04937257 (Comparison of a Virtual Reality Versus an E-Module on Efficacy of Donning and Doffing PPE), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04937257 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of a Virtual Reality Versus an E-Module on Efficacy of Donning and Doffing PPE: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2020 to 2021Enrolled54ConditionsMedical TrainingArmsVirtual Reality, E-module
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amrita Johna Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine , University Hospitals Case Medical Center , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Myreen E Tomasa Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine , University Hospitals Case Medical Center , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Aditya Haric Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Brigid M Wilsonb Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center , Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Curtis J Donskeyb Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center , Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , OH , USA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare personnel often use incorrect technique for donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE).

objectiveWe tested the hypothesis that medical students receive insufficient training on correct methods for donning and doffing PPE.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of medical students on clinical rotations at two teaching hospitals to determine the type of training they received in PPE technique. The students performed simulations of contaminated PPE removal with fluorescent lotion on gloves and were assessed for correct PPE technique and skin and/or clothing contamination. To obtain additional information on PPE training during medical education, residents, fellows, and attending physicians completed written questionnaires on PPE training received during medical school and on knowledge of PPE protocols recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

resultsOf 27 medical students surveyed, only 11 (41%) reported receiving PPE training, and none had received training requiring demonstration of proficiency. During simulations, 25 of 27 (92.5%) students had one or more lapses in technique and 12 (44%) contaminated their skin with fluorescent lotion. For 100 residents, fellows and attending physicians representing 67 different medical schools, only 53% reported receiving training in use of PPE and only 39% selected correct donning and doffing sequence.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that there is a need for development of effective strategies to train medical students in correct use of PPE. ABBREVIATIONS: PPE: Personal protective equipment; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; SARS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome; MERS: Middle East respiratory syndrome; WHO: World Health Organization; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; OSCE: Objective structured clinical examination.

Indexed as

Personal Protective EquipmentCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Cross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, TeachingHumansInfection ControlInternship and ResidencyStudents, MedicalUnited StatesEbolaeducationinfection controlmedical studentstraining

Identifiers

PMID28178912
PMCPMC5328330
OpenAlexW2583565728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.