Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178346›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Biological responses to disturbance from simulated deep-sea polymetallic nodule mining.

Daniel O B Jones, Stefanie Kaiser, Andrew K Sweetman, Craig R Smith, Lenaick Menot, Annemiek Vink, Dwight Trueblood, Jens Greinert, David S M Billett, Pedro Martinez Arbizu and 7 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing mining impacts in the deep sea.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcriptomic Responses of Blue Bat StarInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Probabilistic ecological risk assessment for deep-sea mining: A Bayesian network for Chatham Rise, Pacific Ocean.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Restoration experiments in polymetallic nodule areas.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Daniel O B JonesNational Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-1649
Stefanie KaiserSenckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Andrew K SweetmanThe Lyell Centre for Earth and Marine Science and Technology, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Craig R SmithDepartment of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Lenaick MenotIfremer, Centre de Bretagne, Plouzané, France.
Annemiek VinkBundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources), Geozentrum Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Dwight TruebloodNOAA Office for Coastal Management, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Jens GreinertGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre For Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
David S M BillettNational Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Pedro Martinez ArbizuSenckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Teresa RadziejewskaPalaeoceanology Unit, Faculty of Geosciences, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Ravail SinghSenckenberg am Meer, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Wilhelmshaven, Germany.
Baban IngoleCSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, Goa, India.
Tanja StratmannNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, and Utrecht University, Yerseke, The Netherlands.
Erik Simon-LledóNational Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jennifer M DurdenNational Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Malcolm R ClarkNational Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial-scale mining for polymetallic nodules could have a major impact on the deep-sea environment, but the effects of these mining activities on deep-sea ecosystems are very poorly known. The first commercial test mining for polymetallic nodules was carried out in 1970. Since then a number of small-scale commercial test mining or scientific disturbance studies have been carried out. Here we evaluate changes in faunal densities and diversity of benthic communities measured in response to these 11 simulated or test nodule mining disturbances using meta-analysis techniques. We find that impacts are often severe immediately after mining, with major negative changes in density and diversity of most groups occurring. However, in some cases, the mobile fauna and small-sized fauna experienced less negative impacts over the longer term. At seven sites in the Pacific, multiple surveys assessed recovery in fauna over periods of up to 26 years. Almost all studies show some recovery in faunal density and diversity for meiofauna and mobile megafauna, often within one year. However, very few faunal groups return to baseline or control conditions after two decades. The effects of polymetallic nodule mining are likely to be long term. Our analyses show considerable negative biological effects of seafloor nodule mining, even at the small scale of test mining experiments, although there is variation in sensitivity amongst organisms of different sizes and functional groups, which have important implications for ecosystem responses. Unfortunately, many past studies have limitations that reduce their effectiveness in determining responses. We provide recommendations to improve future mining impact test studies. Further research to assess the effects of test-mining activities will inform ways to improve mining practices and guide effective environmental management of mining activities.

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmentMiningOceans and SeasAlgorithmsModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID28178346
PMCPMC5298332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.