Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178333›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A comprehensive approach to understand somatic symptoms and their impact on emotional and psychosocial functioning in children.

Rita Cerutti, Valentina Spensieri, Carmela Valastro, Fabio Presaghi, Roberto Canitano, Vincenzo Guidetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05666921 (Somatic Symptoms, Alexithymia and Styles of Attachment), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05666921 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Somatic Symptoms, Alexithymia and Styles of Attachment: a Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMeyer Children's Hospital IRCCSRan2021 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsSomatic Symptom DisorderArmspsychological assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rita CeruttiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Valentina SpensieriDepartment of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Carmela ValastroDepartment of Dynamic and Clinic Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Fabio PresaghiDepartment of Psychology of Developmental and Social Processes, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Roberto CanitanoDivision of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Vincenzo GuidettiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSomatic symptoms are frequently reported by children with significant impairment in functioning. Despite studies on adult populations that suggest somatic symptoms often co-occur with difficulties in identifying and describing feelings, little research has been done in childhood. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and frequency of somatic symptoms as well as to investigate the functional impairment in children with high number of self reported somatic symptoms versus those with fewer somatic symptoms. Additionally the parental perception of their children's somatic symptoms and functioning was explored. Finally, we explored the direct and indirect effects of difficulties in identifying feelings in predicting somatic symptoms and functional disability among school-aged children.

methods356 Italian school-aged children and their mothers participated in this study. Children (mean age = 11.43; SD = 2.41) completed the Children's Somatization Inventory (CSI-24) to assess somatic symptoms, the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) to assess physical and psychosocial functioning and the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) to evaluate alexithymic features. Mothers completed the parental forms of the CSI and the FDI.

resultsAmong children, 66.3% did not declare somatic symptoms and 33.7% reported one or more somatic symptoms in the last two weeks. A significant positive correlation emerged between children's and mothers' CSI total scores. Both children's and mothers' FDI total scores were significantly correlated with CSI scores. A significant correlation was observed between somatic symptoms and alexithymic features. Furthermore, the data showed that somatic symptoms mediated the relationship between difficulties in identifying feelings and functional impairment. Finally, it was showed that alexithymia facet of difficulty in identifying feelings contributed in large part to the prediction of the somatic symptomatology (b = 0.978, p < 0.001; R2 = 0.164, F(5, 350) = 10.32, p < 0.001).

conclusionsFindings from this study provide evidence that a higher frequency of somatic symptoms is associated with functional disabilities and alexithymic facets in school-aged children.

Indexed as

EmotionsPsychologyPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMothersQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID28178333
PMCPMC5298337
OpenAlexW2587241725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.