Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28178298›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

The impact of prenatal exposure to parasitic infections and to anthelminthic treatment on antibody responses to routine immunisations given in infancy: Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Stephen Nash, Alexander J Mentzer, Swaib A Lule, Dennison Kizito, Gaby Smits, Fiona R M van der Klis, Alison M Elliott

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. AssessingiScience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Altered Offspring Immunity in Maternal Parasitic Infections.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Schistosomiasis infections in South African pregnant women: A review.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen NashLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2086-1740
Alexander J MentzerWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Swaib A LuleMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Dennison KizitoMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Gaby SmitsNetherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Fiona R M van der KlisNetherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Alison M ElliottLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUganda Virus Research Institute · UGCentre for Human Genetics · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 064693Wellcome Trust 079110Wellcome Trust 095778Wellcome Trust 106289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic parasitic infections are associated with active immunomodulation which may include by-stander effects on unrelated antigens. It has been suggested that pre-natal exposure to parasitic infections in the mother impacts immunological development in the fetus and hence the offspring's response to vaccines, and that control of parasitic infection among pregnant women will therefore be beneficial. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe used new data from the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study, a trial of anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy conducted in Uganda, to further investigate this hypothesis. 2705 mothers were investigated for parasitic infections and then randomised to albendazole (400mg) versus placebo and praziquantel (40mg/kg) during pregnancy in a factorial design. All mothers received sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine for presumptive treatment of malaria. Offspring received Expanded Programme on Immunisation vaccines at birth, six, 10 and 14 weeks. New data on antibody levels to diphtheria toxin, three pertussis antigens, Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB) and Hepatitis B, measured at one year (April 2004 -May 2007) from 1379 infants were analysed for this report. Additional observational analyses relating maternal infections to infant vaccine responses were also conducted. Helminth infections were highly prevalent amongst mothers (hookworm 43.1%, Mansonella 20.9%, Schistosoma mansoni 17.3%, Strongyloides 11.7%, Trichuris 8.1%) and 9.4% had malaria at enrolment. In the trial analysis we found no overall effect of either anthelminthic intervention on the measured infant vaccine responses. In observational analyses, no species was associated with suppressed responses. Strongyloidiasis was associated with enhanced responses to pertussis toxin, HiB and Hep B vaccine antigens. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results do not support the hypothesis that routine anthelminthic treatment during pregnancy has a benefit for the infant's vaccine response, or that maternal helminth infection has a net suppressive effect on the offspring's response to vaccines.

trial registrationISRCTN.com ISRCTN32849447.

Indexed as

AdultAlbendazoleAnimalsAnthelminticsAntibodies, HelminthAntibody FormationFemaleHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansImmunizationInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMalePraziquantelAlbendazoleAnthelminticsAntibodies, HelminthPraziquantelVaccines

Identifiers

PMID28178298
PMCPMC5298230
OpenAlexW2587037792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.