Observational studyMedicine2017
An artificial neural network prediction model of congenital heart disease based on risk factors: A hospital-based case-control study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of machine learning for diagnosis and prognostic prediction of congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Associations of maternal upper respiratory tract infection/influenza during early pregnancy with congenital heart disease in offspring: evidence from a case-control study and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Pooled it
- The non-genetic paternal factors for congenital heart defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2019Pooled it
- Prediction model for the risk of osteoporosis incorporating factors of disease history and living habits in physical examination of population in Chongqing, Southwest China: based on artificial neural network.BMC public health · 2021Trial
- Use of artificial neural networks to identify the predictive factors of extracorporeal shock wave therapy treating patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Evaluating the Performance of Traditional Pharmacoepidemiologic and Machine Learning Models to Predict Pregnancies at Risk of Major Congenital Malformations.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- The application of machine learning in the evaluation of urinary tract infections incidence in patients in a Nursing and Treatment Facility.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk-prediction nomogram for congenital heart disease in offspring of Chinese pregnant women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Association between lipid profile in early pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart disease in offspring: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Accurately assessing congenital heart disease using artificial intelligence.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of birth defects in central China livebirths, 2015-2022.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Prediction of Long-Term Poor Clinical Outcomes in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Using Neural Networks Model: The BEAST Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence-powered prenatal diagnosis for congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Prediction of risk factors for linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia based on neural network model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Risk Assessment Score and Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detection Algorithm for Hypertension Among Africans: Models From the SIREN Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Article
- Associated factors for prenatally diagnosed fetal congenital heart diseases.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Screening for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes-A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Dietary Quality during Pregnancy and Congenital Heart Defects.Nutrients · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An artificial neural network (ANN) model was developed to predict the risks of congenital heart disease (CHD) in pregnant women.This hospital-based case-control study involved 119 CHD cases and 239 controls all recruited from birth defect surveillance hospitals in Hunan Province between July 2013 and June 2014. All subjects were interviewed face-to-face to fill in a questionnaire that covered 36 CHD-related variables. The 358 subjects were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set at the ratio of 85:15. The training set was used to identify the significant predictors of CHD by univariate logistic regression analyses and develop a standard feed-forward back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model for the prediction of CHD. The testing set was used to test and evaluate the performance of the ANN model. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed on SPSS 18.0. The ANN models were developed on Matlab 7.1.The univariate logistic regression identified 15 predictors that were significantly associated with CHD, including education level (odds ratio = 0.55), gravidity (1.95), parity (2.01), history of abnormal reproduction (2.49), family history of CHD (5.23), maternal chronic disease (4.19), maternal upper respiratory tract infection (2.08), environmental pollution around maternal dwelling place (3.63), maternal exposure to occupational hazards (3.53), maternal mental stress (2.48), paternal chronic disease (4.87), paternal exposure to occupational hazards (2.51), intake of vegetable/fruit (0.45), intake of fish/shrimp/meat/egg (0.59), and intake of milk/soymilk (0.55). After many trials, we selected a 3-layer BPNN model with 15, 12, and 1 neuron in the input, hidden, and output layers, respectively, as the best prediction model. The prediction model has accuracies of 0.91 and 0.86 on the training and testing sets, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and Yuden Index on the testing set (training set) are 0.78 (0.83), 0.90 (0.95), and 0.68 (0.78), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating curve on the testing and training sets are 0.87 and 0.97, respectively.This study suggests that the BPNN model could be used to predict the risk of CHD in individuals. This model should be further improved by large-sample-size research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.