ReviewMedicine2017
The top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis.
Review in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering drug discovery and microbial pathogenesis research in tuberculosis during the two decades of postgenomic era using entity mining approach.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- The top 100 cited studies on bacterial persisters: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Research Hotspot of Drug Treatment of Tuberculosis: A Bibliometric Based on the Top 50 Cited Literatures.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- The Top 100 Most Cited Articles Published in Dentistry: 2020 Update.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Systemic Manifestations of the Periodontal Disease: A Bibliometric Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Most-Cited Authors Who Published Papers in JMIR mHealth and uHealth Using the Authorship-Weighted Scheme: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Applications of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Dentistry: A Bibliometric Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Review
- The 100 Top-Cited Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses on Diabetic Research.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Article
- The 100 top-cited studies on vaccine: a bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- Applying Gini coefficient to evaluate the author research domains associated with the ordering of author names: A bibliometric study.Medicine · 2018Article
- A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007-2016.PloS one · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research have not been identified. The objective of this study was to identify the 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research, and to understand factors resulting in highly cited works, and establish trends in systematic reviews/meta-analyses in tuberculosis research.
methodsThe Web of Science Core Collection was searched for systematic reviews/meta-analyses on tuberculosis up to January 31, 2016. Articles were ranked by citation count and screened by 2 authors. The following information was collected and analyzed from each included study: citation of Web of Science Core Collection, author, country, year, journal, institution, page number, and reference number.
resultsThe 100 top-cited studies were cited from 54 to 662 times and were published between 1997 and 2014. Ten authors have more than 1 study as the first author and 10 authors have more than 1 study as corresponding author. The country with the most top-cited studies was USA (n = 26). The institutions with the largest number of the studies were McGill University in Canada (n = 18). The studies were published in 32 journals, whereas 12 were published in PloS Medicine, followed by Lancet Infectious Diseases (n = 11).
conclusionsDeveloped countries and high-impact journals may publish more top-cited systematic review/meta-analysis in tuberculosis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.