Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28177574›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2017

Student award for outstanding research winner in the Ph.D. category for the 2017 society for biomaterials annual meeting and exposition, april 5-8, 2017, Minneapolis, Minnesota: Characterization of protein interactions with molecularly imprinted hydrogels that possess engineered affinity for high isoelectric point biomarkers.

John R Clegg, Justin X Zhong, Afshan S Irani, Joann Gu, David S Spencer, Nicholas A Peppas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Affinity Hydrogels for Protein Delivery.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Protein-Imprinted Polymers: The Shape of Things to Come?Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John R CleggDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Justin X ZhongMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Afshan S IraniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Joann GuMcKetta Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
David S SpencerInstitute for Biomaterials Drug Delivery and Regenerative Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Nicholas A PeppasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Sensor arrays based on molecularly imprinted polymers for diagnosis of Sjogren's syndromeR01EB022025 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ANSLYN, ERIC V., PEPPAS, NICHOLAS A · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) with selective affinity for protein biomarkers could find extensive utility as environmentally robust, cost-efficient biomaterials for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. In order to develop recognitive, synthetic biomaterials for prohibitively expensive protein biomarkers, we have developed a molecular imprinting technique that utilizes structurally similar, analogue proteins. Hydrogel microparticles synthesized by molecular imprinting with trypsin, lysozyme, and cytochrome c possessed an increased affinity for alternate high isoelectric point biomarkers both in isolation and plasma-mimicking adsorption conditions. Imprinted and non-imprinted P(MAA-co-AAm-co-DEAEMA) microgels containing PMAO-PEGMA functionalized polycaprolactone nanoparticles were net-anionic, polydisperse, and irregularly shaped. MIPs and control non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) exhibited regions of Freundlich and BET isotherm adsorption behavior in a range of non-competitive protein solutions, where MIPs exhibited enhanced adsorption capacity in the Freundlich isotherm regions. In a competitive condition, imprinting with analogue templates (trypsin, lysozyme) increased the adsorption capacity of microgels for cytochrome c by 162% and 219%, respectively, as compared to a 122% increase provided by traditional bulk imprinting with cytochrome c. Our results suggest that molecular imprinting with analogue protein templates is a viable synthetic strategy for enhancing hydrogel-biomarker affinity and promoting specific protein adsorption behavior in biological fluids. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 1565-1574, 2017.

Indexed as

AdsorptionAnimalsAwards and PrizesBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCattleChickensHydrogelsIsoelectric PointMolecular ImprintingNanoparticlesPolyanhydridesPolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteinsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersHydrogelsPolyanhydridespolycaprolactonePolyesterspoly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate polymerPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteinsbiomimeticsintelligent hydrogelsmolecular imprintingprotein adsorption

Identifiers

PMID28177574
PMCPMC6103214
OpenAlexW2586579232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.