Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28177494›Full record

ReviewAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples.

L A Renfro, D J Sargent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L A RenfroDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
D J SargentDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesKL2TR000136 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$6.6M
Methodology for development, validation, and use of novel endpoints in oncologyR01CA174779 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANDREKAR, SUMITHRA JAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000136NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, cancers once viewed as relatively homogeneous in terms of organ location and treatment strategy are now better understood to be increasingly heterogeneous across biomarker and genetically defined patient subgroups. This has produced a shift toward development of biomarker-targeted agents during a time when funding for cancer research has been limited; as a result, the need for improved operational efficiency in studying many agent-and-target combinations in parallel has emerged. Platform trials, basket trials, and umbrella trials are new approaches to clinical research driven by this need for enhanced efficiency in the modern era of increasingly specific cancer subpopulations and decreased resources to study treatments for individual cancer subtypes in a traditional way. In this review, we provide an overview of these new types of clinical trial designs, including discussions of motivation for their use, recommended terminology, examples, and challenges encountered in their application.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic ProtocolsModels, StatisticalBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28177494
PMCPMC5834138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.