Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28177460›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Pathway level alterations rather than mutations in single genes predict response to HER2-targeted therapies in the neo-ALTTO trial.

W Shi, T Jiang, P Nuciforo, C Hatzis, E Holmes, N Harbeck, C Sotiriou, L Peña, S Loi, D D Rosa and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis of Pre- and Posttreatment Tissues from the SWOG S0800 Trial Reveals an Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Breast Cancer Genome.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

W ShiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Yale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
T JiangDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Yale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
P NuciforoVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
C HatzisDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Yale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
E HolmesFrontier Science, Inverness, Scotland.
N HarbeckBreast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Munich, Germany.
C SotiriouInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
L PeñaSpanish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group SOLTI, Barcelona, Spain.
S LoiDivision of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia.
D D RosaHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
S ChiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
A WardleyThe Christie/NIHR Clinical Research Facility, Manchester, UK.
T UenoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
J RossariHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
H EidtmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Campus Kiel, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
A ArmourNovartis, Cambridge.
M Piccart-GebhartInstitut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
D L RimmDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Yale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
J BaselgaMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Memorial Hospital, New York, USA.
L PusztaiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Yale University, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
Yale Cancer Center · USHospital Moinhos de Vento · BRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEBC Cancer Agency · CAChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEFrontier Science Foundation · CHGerman Breast group · DEKyoto University Hospital · JPMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNovartis (China) · CNPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSpanish Head & Neck Cancer Cooperative Group · ESVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology · ES

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We performed whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment biopsies and examined whether genome-wide metrics of overall mutational load, clonal heterogeneity or alterations at variant, gene, and pathway levels are associated with treatment response and survival. Patients and Methods: Two hundred and three biopsies from the NeoALTTO trial were analyzed. Mutations were called with MuTect, and Strelka, using pooled normal DNA. Associations between DNA alterations and outcome were evaluated by logistic and Cox-proportional hazards regression. Results: There were no recurrent single gene mutations significantly associated with pathologic complete response (pCR), except PIK3CA [odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, P = 0.0185]. Mutations in 33 of 714 pathways were significantly associated with response, but different genes were affected in different individuals. PIK3CA was present in 23 of these pathways defining a ‘trastuzumab resistance-network’ of 459 genes. Cases with mutations in this network had low pCR rates to trastuzumab (2/50, 4%) compared with cases with no mutations (9/16, 56%), OR = 0.035; P < 0.001. Mutations in the ‘Regulation of RhoA activity’ pathway were associated with higher pCR rate to lapatinib (OR = 14.8, adjusted P = 0.001), lapatinib + trastuzumab (OR = 3.0, adjusted P = 0.09), and all arms combined (OR = 3.77, adjusted P = 0.02). Patients (n = 124) with mutations in the trastuzumab resistance network but intact RhoA pathway had 2% (1/41) pCR rate with trastuzumab alone (OR = 0.026, P = 0.001) but adding lapatinib increased pCR rate to 45% (17/38, OR = 1.68, P = 0.3). Patients (n = 46) who had no mutations in either gene set had 6% pCR rate (1/15) with lapatinib, but had the highest pCR rate, 52% (8/15) with trastuzumab alone. Conclusions: Mutations in the RhoA pathway are associated with pCR to lapatinib and mutations in a PIK3CA-related network are associated with resistance to trastuzumab. The combined mutation status of these two pathways could define patients with very low response rate to trastuzumab alone that can be augmented by adding lapatinib or substituting trastuzumab with lapatinib.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBreast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesExome SequencingFemaleHumansLapatinibMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationProportional Hazards ModelsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibPIK3CA protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinRHOA protein, humanTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID28177460
PMCPMC5834036
OpenAlexW2525265150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.