Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28177270›Full record

ReviewAstrobiology2017

Biosignature Preservation and Detection in Mars Analog Environments.

Lindsay E Hays, Heather V Graham, David J Des Marais, Elisabeth M Hausrath, Briony Horgan, Thomas M McCollom, M Niki Parenteau, Sally L Potter-McIntyre, Amy J Williams, Kennda L Lynch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Astrobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Planetary microbiology: microbes, planets, and the search for life.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perspectives on Mars Sample Return: A critical resource for planetary science and exploration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Astrobiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Biogeochemical fingerprinting of magnetotactic bacterial magnetite.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lindsay E Hays1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California.
Heather V Graham2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/USRA , Baltimore, Maryland.
David J Des Marais3 NASA Ames Research Center , Moffett Field, California.
Elisabeth M Hausrath4 University of Nevada Las Vegas , Las Vegas, Nevada.
Briony Horgan5 Purdue University , West Lafayette, Indiana.
Thomas M McCollom6 University of Colorado , Boulder, Colorado.
M Niki Parenteau3 NASA Ames Research Center , Moffett Field, California.
Sally L Potter-McIntyre7 Southern Illinois University , Carbondale, Illinois.
Amy J Williams8 Towson University , Towson, Maryland.
Kennda L Lynch9 Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review of material relevant to the Conference on Biosignature Preservation and Detection in Mars Analog Environments summarizes the meeting materials and discussions and is further expanded upon by detailed references to the published literature. From this diverse source material, there is a detailed discussion on the habitability and biosignature preservation potential of five primary analog environments: hydrothermal spring systems, subaqueous environments, subaerial environments, subsurface environments, and iron-rich systems. Within the context of exploring past habitable environments on Mars, challenges common to all of these key environments are laid out, followed by a focused discussion for each environment regarding challenges to orbital and ground-based observations and sample selection. This leads into a short section on how these challenges could influence our strategies and priorities for the astrobiological exploration of Mars. Finally, a listing of urgent needs and future research highlights key elements such as development of instrumentation as well as continued exploration into how Mars may have evolved differently from Earth and what that might mean for biosignature preservation and detection. Key Words: Biosignature preservation-Biosignature detection-Mars analog environments-Conference report-Astrobiological exploration. Astrobiology 17, 363-400.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsEarth, PlanetIronWaterIronWater

Identifiers

PMID28177270
PMCPMC5478115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.