ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2017
Studying Delusions Within Research Domain Criteria: The Challenge of Configural Traits When Building a Mechanistic Foundation for Abnormal Beliefs.
Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acquiescing to intuition in individuals prone to delusions: alterations in dual processes and cognitive control.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Our understanding of belief formation, maintenance, and change is in its infancy, yet it is absolutely essential to make progress in understanding these processes to parse the puzzle of psychotic delusions. In this companion to Bebbington and Freeman, I consider a number of Research Domain Criteria constructs that may be helpful for exploring these processes but ultimately conclude (following Risen) that delusions are likely the result of several systems failing. I close with 4 recommendations for making progress: (1) prepare to study a variable space defined by several relevant constructs, (2) include the study of "unsanctioned" constructs, (3) examine the relationships between brain regions, rather than the local abnormalities, and (4) develop rigorous computational models of delusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.