Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28177044›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2017

Comparison of LAMP and PCR for molecular mass screening of sand flies for Leishmania martiniquensis infection.

Saruda Tiwananthagorn, Hirotomo Kato, Ranchana Yeewa, Amontip Muengpan, Raxsina Polseela, Saovanee Leelayoova

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autochthonous canine cutaneous leishmaniasis caused byCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Analytical Performance of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay forThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saruda TiwananthagornChiang Mai University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Hirotomo KatoJichi Medical University, Department of Infection and Immunity, Division of Medical Zoology, Tochigi, Japan.
Ranchana YeewaChiang Mai University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Amontip MuengpanChiang Mai University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Raxsina PolseelaNaresuan University, Faculty of Medical Science, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Saovanee LeelayoovaPhramongkutklao College of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chiang Mai University · THJichi Medical University · JPNaresuan University · THPhramongkutklao College of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmaniasis caused by Leishmania martiniquensis infection has been reported in human and domestic animals of Martinique Island, Germany, Switzerland, USA, Myanmar and Thailand. The peculiar clinical features of disseminated cutaneous and visceral forms co-existence render the urgent need of specific diagnostic tool to identify the natural sand fly vectors for effective prevention and control strategies. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of 18S rRNA gene as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of minicircle kinetoplast DNA gene (PCR-mkDNA) have never been applied to detect L. martiniquensis and L. siamensis in sand fly vectors.

objectiveThe present study was aimed to validate malachite green-LAMP (MG-LAMP) and PCR-mkDNA techniques to detect L. martiniquensis in sand fly vectors, compared with the conventional PCR of internal transcribed spacer 1 (PCR-ITS1).

methodsWe compared the validity of LAMP of 18S rRNA gene and PCR-mkDNA, to PCR-ITS1 in simulation model of L. martiniquensis infection in Sergentomyia gemmea sand flies. Attributable to the sensitivity and specificity, PCR-mkDNA was consecutively applied to detect L. martiniquensis in 380 female sand fly individuals captured in the newly identified affected region of Lamphun Province, Thailand. FINDINGS AND MAIN

conclusionsResults showed that PCR-mkDNA could detect at least one promastigote per sand fly, which was 10-time superior to LAMP and PCR-ITS1. In addition, PCR-mkDNA was more specific, able to differentiate L. martiniquensis from other viscerotropic Leishmania species, such as L. siamensis, L. (L.) donovani, and L. (L.) infantum. Consecutively, mass screening of L. martiniquensis in 380 female sand fly individuals by PCR-mkDNA was implemented in a new affected area of Thailand where a patient with leishmaniasis/HIV co-infection resides; however Leishmania DNA was undetected. In conclusion, PCR-mkDNA is a promising tool for molecular mass screening of L. martiniquensis infection in outbreak areas where several species of Leishmania and sand flies co-exist.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, KinetoplastDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansLeishmaniaMass ScreeningNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionPsychodidaeRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificityThailandDNA, KinetoplastDNA, ProtozoanRNA, ProtozoanRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID28177044
PMCPMC5293119
OpenAlexW2585457341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.