Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28176966›Full record

ArticleRMD open2017

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological pharmacological treatment: a systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis.

Andrea Regel, Alexandre Sepriano, Xenofon Baraliakos, Désirée van der Heijde, Jürgen Braun, Robert Landewé, Filip Van den Bosch, Louise Falzon, Sofia Ramiro

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. La Tunisie medicale · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea RegelRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum , Herne , Germany.
Alexandre SeprianoDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-0229
Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum , Herne , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-9362
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
Jürgen BraunRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum , Herne , Germany.
Robert LandewéDepartment of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Filip Van den BoschGhent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium.
Louise FalzonCenter for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center , New York, New York , USA.
Sofia RamiroDepartment of Rheumatology , Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden , The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DEAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the efficacy and safety of non-biological therapies in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) to inform the update of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of axSpA. A systematic literature review (2009-2016) of all non-pharmacological treatments, non-biological drugs (except targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) and surgical therapies was performed. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials were assessed for efficacy and safety, while observational studies with a comparator were assessed for safety. All relevant efficacy and safety outcomes were included. Study heterogeneity precluded data pooling. If possible, Cohen's effect size was calculated for non-pharmacological treatments. In total, 45 papers and 2 abstracts were included. Studies on non-pharmacological treatments were very heterogeneous but overall confirmed a benefit for regular exercises, with small improvements in disease activity, function and spinal mobility. New studies on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) confirmed their efficacy and new safety signals were not found. NSAIDs used continuously compared with on-demand did not reduce the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) mean change over 2 years in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with normal C reactive protein (CRP; ≤5 mg/L) (1 'negative' RCT (0.9 vs 0.8; p=0.62)), while for patients with high CRP, conflicting results were found (1 'positive' RCT (0.2 vs 1.7; p=0.003), 1 'negative' RCT (1.68 vs 0.96; p=0.28)). No new trials were found for conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Short-term high-dose systemic glucocorticoids showed limited efficacy. Regular exercises may improve several outcomes. Efficacy and safety of NSAIDs in axSpA are confirmed. Glucocorticoids are not proven to be effective in axSpA and new data on csDMARDs are lacking.

Indexed as

Ankylosing SpondylitisSpondyloarthritisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28176966
PMCPMC5278330
OpenAlexW2583030387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.