Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28176936›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017

Add-on bevacizumab can prevent early clinical deterioration and prolong survival in newly diagnosed partially resected glioblastoma patients with a poor performance status.

Nobuhiro Hata, Koji Yoshimoto, Ryusuke Hatae, Daisuke Kuga, Yojiro Akagi, Yuhei Sangatsuda, Satoshi O Suzuki, Tadahisa Shono, Masahiro Mizoguchi, Koji Iihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nobuhiro HataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University; Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center.
Koji YoshimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Ryusuke HataeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Daisuke KugaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Yojiro AkagiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Yuhei SangatsudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Satoshi O SuzukiDepartment of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Tadahisa ShonoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University; Department of Neurosurgery, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka.
Masahiro MizoguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University; Department of Neurosurgery, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe AVAglio trial established the beneficial effect of add-on bevacizumab (BEV) for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastomas (nd-GBMs) that led to the approval of BEV for the treatment of these patients in Japan. However, the rationality of using BEV as a first-line treatment for nd-GBMs remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of a case series of nd-GBM patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe outcomes of 69 nd-GBM patients treated after 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and genetic analyses were performed, and estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Since add-on BEV therapy was only used for partially resected GBMs (pr-GBMs) after its approval in 2013, the patients were subdivided into 3 treatment groups: Type I, partial removal with temozolomide (TMZ)/BEV and concurrent radiotherapy (CCRT); Type II, partial removal with TMZ and CCRT; and Type III, gross total removal with TMZ and CCRT.

resultsThe PFS rate of Type I patients was significantly higher than that of Type II patients (

conclusionOur findings suggest that add-on BEV can prevent early clinical deterioration of pr-GBM patients and contribute to a prolonged survival, especially for those with a poor PS.

Indexed as

bevacizumabglioblastomaperformance statussurvivalunresectable

Identifiers

PMID28176936
PMCPMC5261854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.