ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2017
Contextualizing the relevance of basic sciences: small-group simulation with debrief for first- and second-year medical students in an integrated curriculum.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Work-based Surface Anatomy Teaching Model: A Contextualized Method for Promoting Learning Competencies in Medical Curricula.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Article
- A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Pathology as a Basic Medical Subject: Its Relevance and Application During Clinical Practice in Jordanian MD Programs, Interns' and Residents' Perspectives.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Integrating Foundational and Clinical Science Remotely by Combining Team-Based Learning and Simulation.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- The Physician Experience Teaching an Integrated Curriculum to First-Year Medical Students.The Permanente journal · 2023Article
- Antiviral Pharmacology: A Standardized Patient Case for Preclinical Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Basic Medical Sciences Knowledge Retention for Clinical Practice.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Medical Students' Attitude and Perception Towards Basic Medical Science Subjects at Wollo University, Northeast Ethiopia.Advances in medical education and practice · 2021Article
- The Simulated Virology Clinic: A Standardized Patient Exercise for Preclinical Medical Students Supporting Basic and Clinical Science Integration.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020Article
- The GI Simulated Clinic: A Clinical Reasoning Exercise Supporting Medical Students' Basic and Clinical Science Integration.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020Article
- Patient-Centered Team-Based Learning in Pre-Clinical Curriculum Supporting the Application of Knowledge to Real-World Clinical Experience.Medical science educator · 2020Article
- Simulation as a Tool to Illustrate Clinical Pharmacology Concepts to Healthcare Program Learners.Current pharmacology reports · 2020Review
- Utilization of high-fidelity simulation to address challenges with the basic science immunology education of preclinical medical students.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Historical medical mission modernised with conceptualised case-based simulation: cardiorespiratory disease model integrating clinical skills and basic science physiology.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2019Article
- Cognitive processing differences of experts and novices when correlating anatomy and cross-sectional imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2018Article
- Views on group simulation in an integrated medical curriculum.Advances in medical education and practice · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThere has been a call for increased integration of basic and clinical sciences during preclinical years of undergraduate medical education. Despite the recognition that clinical simulation is an effective pedagogical tool, little has been reported on its use to demonstrate the relevance of basic science principles to the practice of clinical medicine. We hypothesized that simulation with an integrated science and clinical debrief used with early learners would illustrate the importance of basic science principles in clinical diagnosis and management of patients.
methodsSmall groups of first- and second-year medical students were engaged in a high-fidelity simulation followed by a comprehensive debrief facilitated by a basic scientist and clinician. Surveys including anchored and open-ended questions were distributed at the conclusion of each experience.
resultsThe majority of the students agreed that simulation followed by an integrated debrief illustrated the clinical relevance of basic sciences (mean ± standard deviation: 93.8% ± 2.9% of first-year medical students; 96.7% ± 3.5% of second-year medical students) and its importance in patient care (92.8% of first-year medical students; 90.4% of second-year medical students). In a thematic analysis of open-ended responses, students felt that these experiences provided opportunities for direct application of scientific knowledge to diagnosis and treatment, improving student knowledge, simulating real-world experience, and developing clinical reasoning, all of which specifically helped them understand the clinical relevance of basic sciences.
conclusionSmall-group simulation followed by a debrief that integrates basic and clinical sciences is an effective means of demonstrating the relationship between scientific fundamentals and patient care for early learners. As more medical schools embrace integrated curricula and seek opportunities for integration, our model is a novel approach that can be utilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.