Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28176867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Primary macrophages and J774 cells respond differently to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Nuria Andreu, Jody Phelan, Paola F de Sessions, Jacqueline M Cliff, Taane G Clark, Martin L Hibberd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mycobacterial Nucleic Acids Modulate Host Innate Immune Responses.Journal of infectious disease and therapy · 2024
    Article
  18. Macrophage variants in laboratory research: most are well done, but some are RAW.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nuria AndreuPathogen Molecular Biology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jody PhelanPathogen Molecular Biology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paola F de SessionsGenome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore.
Jacqueline M CliffTB Centre and Department of Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Taane G ClarkPathogen Molecular Biology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martin L HibberdPathogen Molecular Biology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15103Medical Research Council MR/K000551/1Medical Research Council MR/M01360X/1Medical Research Council MR/N010469/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages play an essential role in the early immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and are the cell type preferentially infected in vivo. Primary macrophages and macrophage-like cell lines are commonly used as infection models, although the physiological relevance of cell lines, particularly for host-pathogen interaction studies, is debatable. Here we use high-throughput RNA-sequencing to analyse transcriptome dynamics of two macrophage models in response to M. tuberculosis infection. Specifically, we study the early response of bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages and cell line J774 to infection with live and γ-irradiated (killed) M. tuberculosis. We show that infection with live bacilli specifically alters the expression of host genes such as Rsad2, Ifit1/2/3 and Rig-I, whose potential roles in resistance to M. tuberculosis infection have not yet been investigated. In addition, the response of primary macrophages is faster and more intense than that of J774 cells in terms of number of differentially expressed genes and magnitude of induction/repression. Our results point to potentially novel processes leading to immune containment early during M. tuberculosis infection, and support the idea that important differences exist between primary macrophages and cell lines, which should be taken into account when choosing a macrophage model to study host-pathogen interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedGamma RaysGene Expression ProfilingMacrophagesMiceMycobacterium tuberculosisTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomeTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID28176867
PMCPMC5296737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.