ArticleScientific reports2017
ePro-ClearSee: a simple immunohistochemical method that does not require sectioning of plant samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual Color tau-STED Super Resolution Microscopy inBio-protocol · 2026Article
- Florigen-producing cells express FPF1-LIKE PROTEIN 1 to accelerate flowering and stem growth in Arabidopsis.Developmental cell · 2025Article
- CRISPR-FISH: A CRISPR/Cas9-Based In Situ Labeling Method.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- 3D multiple immunoimaging using whole male organs in rice.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Advances in Two-Photon Imaging in Plants.Plant & cell physiology · 2021Review
- Physical and chemical mechanisms of tissue optical clearing.iScience · 2021Review
- Decrosslinking enables visualization of RNA-guided endonuclease-in situ labeling signals for DNA sequences in plant tissues.Journal of experimental botany · 2020Article
- Probing the 3D architecture of the plant nucleus with microscopy approaches: challenges and solutions.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2019Review
- See-through observation of malaria parasite behaviors in the mosquito vector.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Tackling Plant Meiosis: From Model Research to Crop Improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Imaging of Molecular and Developmental Responses to Abiotic Stresses in Reproductive Tissues.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigations into the epigenetic status of individual cells within tissues can produce both epigenetic data for different cell types and positional information of the cells. Thus, these investigations are important for understanding the intra- and inter-cellular control systems of developmental and environmental responses in plants. However, a simple method to detect epigenetic modifications of individual cells in plant tissues is not yet available because detection of the modifications requires immunohistochemistry using specific antibodies. In this study, we developed a simple immunohistochemical method that does not require sectioning to investigate epigenetic modifications. This method uses a clearing system to detect methylated histones, acetylated histones, methylated DNA and/or centromeric histone H3 variants. Analyses of four dicots and five monocots indicated that this method provides a universal technique to investigate epigenetic modifications in diverse plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.