Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28176821›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Spatial variation and inconsistency between estimates of onset of muscle activation from EMG and ultrasound.

Angela V Dieterich, Alberto Botter, Taian Martins Vieira, Anneli Peolsson, Frank Petzke, Paul Davey, Deborah Falla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Toward Soft Wearable Strain Sensors for Muscle Activity Monitoring.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Angela V DieterichPain Clinic, Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Alberto BotterLaboratory of Engineering of the Neuromuscular System and Motor Rehabilitation, Department of Electronics, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Taian Martins VieiraLaboratory of Engineering of the Neuromuscular System and Motor Rehabilitation, Department of Electronics, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Frank PetzkePain Clinic, Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Paul DaveySchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Deborah FallaCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Polytechnic University of Turin · ITUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DECurtin University · AULinköping University · SEUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed onset of muscle activation can be a descriptor of impaired motor control. Activation onset can be estimated from electromyography (EMG)-registered muscle excitation and from ultrasound-registered muscle motion, which enables non-invasive measurements in deep muscles. However, in voluntary activation, EMG- and ultrasound-detected activation onsets may not correspond. To evaluate this, ten healthy men performed isometric elbow flexion at 20% to 70% of their maximal force. Utilising a multi-channel electrode transparent to ultrasound, EMG and M(otion)-mode ultrasound were recorded simultaneously over the biceps brachii muscle. The time intervals between automated and visually estimated activation onsets were correlated with the regional variation of EMG and muscle motion onset, contraction level and speed. Automated and visual onsets indicated variable time intervals between EMG- and motion onset, median (interquartile range) 96 (121) ms and 48 (72) ms, respectively. In 17% (computed analysis) or 23% (visual analysis) of trials, motion onset was detected before local EMG onset. Multi-channel EMG and M-mode ultrasound revealed regional differences in activation onset, which decreased with higher contraction speed (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.45, P < 0.001). In voluntary activation the heterogeneous motor unit recruitment together with immediate motion transmission may explain the high variation of the time intervals between local EMG- and ultrasound-detected activation onset.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28176821
PMCPMC5296741
OpenAlexW2587694070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.