ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017
The integration of neural information by a passive kinetic stimulus and galvanic vestibular stimulation in the lateral vestibular nucleus.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation down-regulated NMDA receptors in vestibular nucleus of PD model.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neural Interruption by Unilateral Labyrinthectomy Biases the Directional Preference of Otolith-Related Vestibular Neurons.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Postural control in paw distance after labyrinthectomy-induced vestibular imbalance.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Dominant parameter of galvanic vestibular stimulation for the non-associative learning processes.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Repeated Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Modified the Neuronal Potential in the Vestibular Nucleus.Neural plasticity · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite an easy control and the direct effects on vestibular neurons, the clinical applications of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) have been restricted because of its unclear activities as input. On the other hand, some critical conclusions have been made in the peripheral and the central processing of neural information by kinetic stimuli with different motion frequencies. Nevertheless, it is still elusive how the neural responses to simultaneous GVS and kinetic stimulus are modified during transmission and integration at the central vestibular area. To understand how the neural information was transmitted and integrated, we examined the neuronal responses to GVS, kinetic stimulus, and their combined stimulus in the vestibular nucleus. The neuronal response to each stimulus was recorded, and its responding features (amplitude and baseline) were extracted by applying the curve fitting based on a sinusoidal function. Twenty-five (96.2%) comparisons of the amplitudes showed that the amplitudes decreased during the combined stimulus (p < 0.001). However, the relations in the amplitudes (slope = 0.712) and the baselines (slope = 0.747) were linear. The neuronal effects by the different stimuli were separately estimated; the changes of the amplitudes were mainly caused by the kinetic stimulus and those of the baselines were largely influenced by GVS. Therefore, the slopes in the comparisons implied the neural sensitivity to the applied stimuli. Using the slopes, we found that the reduced amounts of the neural information were transmitted. Overall, the comparisons of the responding features demonstrated the linearity and the subadditivity in the neural transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28176264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.