Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28176210›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2017

Experts by Experience: Peer Support and its Use with the Homeless.

Stephanie L Barker, Nick Maguire

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04012697 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Peer Support Workers in the Emergency Department for People Experiencing Homelessness in the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04012697 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Peer Support Workers in the Emergency Department for People Experiencing Homelessness in the Niagara Region of Ontario, Canada

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled19ConditionsHomelessness, Health Behavior, Health Care Utilization, Health Care Seeking BehaviorArmsPeer Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of Interventions for Meaningful Activity Participation in Homelessness: A Systematic Review.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Different Way of Working: Embedding Clinical Psychology Placements in Third Sector Organisations Supporting People Experiencing Homelessness.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie L BarkerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, University Rd, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. S.L.Barker@soton.ac.uk.
Nick MaguireSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Building 44, University Rd, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The homeless population has complex needs. Peers with experience of homelessness offer unique perspectives in supporting those experiencing homelessness. Peer support fostered and developed by professional organisations, termed intentional peer support (IPS), formalises this process. This review aims to assess the effectiveness of IPS as an intervention with young adults and adult homeless persons (including streetdwelling and those within services). PyscINFO, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched, resulting in ten studies, involving 1,829 participants. Peer support has significant impacts on quality of life, drug/alcohol use, and social support. Common elements of peer support are identified, suggesting possible processes that underlie effective peer support. Shared experiences, role modelling, and social support are suggested to be vital aspects of peer support and moderate changes in homeless clients. One study was deemed to have moderate/high quality; the remaining studies had low and moderate quality. Limitations of each are discussed.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsPeer GroupSocial SupportHumansQuality of LifeSubstance-Related DisordersDrug/alcohol useHomelessnessPeer supportQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID28176210
PMCPMC5438434
OpenAlexW2587360208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.