ReviewAnimal cognition2017
Extended spider cognition.
Review in Animal cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional and Taxonomic Structuring of Ground-Dwelling Spider Communities Under the Combined Effects of the Environment and Metal Contamination.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Microstructural insights into the functional morphology and formation logic of spherulitic-fibrous prismatic architecture in the shell-like eggcase of the argonaut octopods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Insights Into Spatial Orientation and Cognition in Tarantulas (Araneae: Theraphosidae) Under Natural Conditions, With Notes on Possible Ontogenetic Niche Shifts.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- The chemosensory toolkit of the cursorial spider Pisaura mirabilis.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Did Down-Regulated Instincts Enable Human Gene-Culture Coevolution?Evolutionary anthropology · 2025Review
- Living Kombucha Electronics with Proteinoids.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Unpacking the navigation toolbox: insights from comparative cognition.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the brain evolution of web-building spiders.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Article
- Cognitive Archeology and the Attentional System: An Evolutionary Mismatch for the GenusJournal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Spider Ecology and Behaviour-Spiders as Model Organisms.Insects · 2023Article
- The PROUST hypothesis: the embodiment of olfactory cognition.Animal cognition · 2023Review
- An Ant-Mimicking Jumping Spider Achieves Higher Predation Probability with Lower Success Rate When Exposed to Ethanol.Insects · 2022Article
- Evolution of Brains and Computers: The Roads Not Taken.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Outsourced hearing in an orb-weaving spider that uses its web as an auditory sensor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Defending the use of the mutual manipulability criterion in the extended cognition debate.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Sowing the seeds of intentionality: Motor intentions in plants.Plant signaling & behavior · 2021Review
- Minimal physicalism as a scale-free substrate for cognition and consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Article
- Shells as 'extended architecture': to escape isolation, social hermit crabs choose shells with the right external architecture.Animal cognition · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a tension between the conception of cognition as a central nervous system (CNS) process and a view of cognition as extending towards the body or the contiguous environment. The centralised conception requires large or complex nervous systems to cope with complex environments. Conversely, the extended conception involves the outsourcing of information processing to the body or environment, thus making fewer demands on the processing power of the CNS. The evolution of extended cognition should be particularly favoured among small, generalist predators such as spiders, and here, we review the literature to evaluate the fit of empirical data with these contrasting models of cognition. Spiders do not seem to be cognitively limited, displaying a large diversity of learning processes, from habituation to contextual learning, including a sense of numerosity. To tease apart the central from the extended cognition, we apply the mutual manipulability criterion, testing the existence of reciprocal causal links between the putative elements of the system. We conclude that the web threads and configurations are integral parts of the cognitive systems. The extension of cognition to the web helps to explain some puzzling features of spider behaviour and seems to promote evolvability within the group, enhancing innovation through cognitive connectivity to variable habitat features. Graded changes in relative brain size could also be explained by outsourcing information processing to environmental features. More generally, niche-constructed structures emerge as prime candidates for extending animal cognition, generating the selective pressures that help to shape the evolving cognitive system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.