Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28175932›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2017

[Nerve injuries and traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus : Imaging diagnostics and therapeutic options].

D Schwarz, M T Pedro, C Brand, M Bendszus, G Antoniadis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Traumatic peripheral nerve lesions : Diagnosis and treatment].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D SchwarzAG MR-Neurographie, Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. daniel.schwarz@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
M T PedroSektion Periphere Nervenchirurgie, Neurochirurgische Klinik der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Straße 2, 89312, Günzburg, Deutschland.
C BrandSektion Periphere Nervenchirurgie, Neurochirurgische Klinik der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Straße 2, 89312, Günzburg, Deutschland.
M BendszusAG MR-Neurographie, Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
G AntoniadisSektion Periphere Nervenchirurgie, Neurochirurgische Klinik der Universität Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Straße 2, 89312, Günzburg, Deutschland. gregor.antoniadis@uni-ulm.de.
Bundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueTraumatic lesions of peripheral nerves and the brachial plexus are feared complications because they frequently result in severe functional impairment. The prognosis is greatly dependent on the correct early diagnosis and the right choice of treatment regimen. It is important to distinguish between open and closed injuries. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsInitial imaging must critically evaluate or prove nerve continuity and is commonly achieved by high-resolution ultrasonography. During the further course, reactive soft tissue alterations, such as constrictive scarring or neuroma formation can be detected. In the case of deep nerve and plexus injuries this can be excellently achieved by dedicated magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) sequences. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: The signal yield from brachial plexus imaging can be critically enhanced by the use of dedicated surface coil arrays. Furthermore, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may enable the regeneration potential of a nerve lesion to be recognized in the future. PERFORMANCE: Multiple reports have shown that neurosonography enables a precise evaluation of peripheral nerve structures (up to 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity in nerve transection) and that the method can critically impact on therapeutic decision-making in 60%. Currently, there are only few quantitative data on the exact performance of MRN in traumatic nerve lesions; however, individual reports indicate a high level of agreement with intraoperative findings. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In the initial work-up, especially in the case of peripheral, superficial and lesser nerve injuries, neurosonography is the preferred imaging approach to evaluate nerve integrity and the extent of nerve lesions. In the case of extensive nerve injury of proximal nerves and structures of the plexus as well as in the case of suspected root avulsion MRN is the method of choice.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresSensitivity and SpecificityMagnetic resonance neurographyNerve and plexus lesionsNerve reconstructionNeurosonographyPeripheral nerve injuries

Identifiers

PMID28175932
OpenAlexW2587677916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.