Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28174448›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2016

Effects of two different mobilization techniques on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a comparative study.

Surabhi Agarwal, Shahid Raza, Jamal Ali Moiz, Shahnawaz Anwer, Ahmad H Alghadir

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05347355 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Spencer Technique and Gongs Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, Disability and Scapular Symmetry in Patients With Phase ii Adhesive Capsulitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsAdhesive CapsulitisArmsSpencer technique along with conventional treatment, Gongs Mobilization along with conventional treatment
NCT05771220 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Combined With Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Adhesive Capsulitis Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaif UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsAdhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderArmsradial extracorporeal shockwave therapy+ evidence-based physical therapy, sham radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy+ evidence-based physical therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Added Value of Neural Mobilization Techniques to Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis: Randomized Controlled Trial.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of Kaltenborn mobilization technique and muscle energy technique on range of motion, pain and function in subjects with chronic shoulder adhesive capsulitis.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Surabhi AgarwalCentre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, India.
Shahid RazaCentre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, India.
Jamal Ali MoizCentre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, India.
Shahnawaz AnwerRehabilitation Research Chair, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia; Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, India.
Ahmad H AlghadirRehabilitation Research Chair, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Jamia Millia Islamia · INDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · INKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effects of two different mobilization techniques in the management of patients with adhesive capsulitis. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty non-diabetic men and women with adhesive capsulitis were randomly allocated to the reverse distraction group (n=15) or Kaltenborn group (n=15). The reverse distraction technique and Kaltenborn's caudal and posterior glides (grades III and IV) were applied 10-15 times along with conventional physical therapy for 18 treatment sessions in 6 weeks. Pain was measured with a visual analog scale, abduction and external rotation range of motion with goniometry, hand behind back reach with inch tape, and functional disability with the Flexilevel scale of shoulder function before and after the treatment. [Results] Although all the variables improved significantly in both groups after 18 intervention sessions, reverse distraction was significantly better than Kaltenborn's caudal and posterior glides in decreasing pain and improving abduction range of motion and functional scores. [Conclusion] This study supports the clinical use of reverse distraction as an alternative to conventional mobilization techniques to decrease pain and improve range of motion and functional scores in patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Indexed as

Adhesive capsulitisKaltenborn’s glideReverse distraction technique

Identifiers

PMID28174448
PMCPMC5276757
OpenAlexW2562293776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.