ReviewThe oncologist2017
Cancer and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: A Review.
Review in The oncologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose DOACs in extended treatment of VTE: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Regional and systemic complications following glioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.Blood advances · 2021Guideline
- Systemic health impact of cancer-associated extracellular vesicles and particles.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Enhancing venous thromboembolism risk prediction after immunotherapy for lung cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis After Surgery in Patients with Gastric or Colorectal Cancer Receiving Anticoagulant Prophylaxis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Cytogenetic alterations and coagulopathy in breast cancer patients: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- The Impact of Anticoagulation in Patients With Isolated Cancer-Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Dual-Center Cohort Study.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification After Pancreatic and Liver Cancer Surgery Using Claims Data.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative safety of direct oral anticoagulants and low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer in Europe.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Observational
- Sex disparities in the associations between accelerometer-measured movement behaviors and subsequent thromboembolism risk in cancer patients.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Antithrombotic therapy at the end-of-life-continue or stop?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Comparison of anticoagulants and risk of ischemic stroke in patients with acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor microemboli: role in venous thromboembolism in oncologic patients.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- Thrombocytosis in cancer patients: when more is not better-in fact, the opposite.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Relationship of cancer and dual antiplatelet duration to long-term risk of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer: pathophysiology, risk, and management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT); mechanisms and treatment options.Thrombosis journal · 2025Review
- Access recirculation in continuous kidney replacement therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation: a case report and diagnostic insights.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Patients with cancer are six times more likely to develop VTE than their noncancer counterparts, and VTE is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. Despite the publication of major consensus guidelines setting out recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients, there remains a gulf between these guidelines and clinical practice. In general, thromboprophylaxis is recommended for most patients hospitalized with active cancer. Furthermore, outpatient thromboprophylaxis may be used in carefully selected high-risk ambulatory patients. Certain areas of controversy still remain. Although low-molecular-weight heparin has been shown to be superior to vitamin K antagonists in cancer patients, the role of direct oral anticoagulants is still uncertain. Moreover, recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding, and thrombocytopenia are frequently seen in cancer patients. Optimal anticoagulation in such instances presents a major challenge to clinicians. Modern computed tomography techniques have resulted in an increase in the detection of "incidental" VTE. Despite a growing body of evidence promulgating standard anticoagulant treatment in such cases, these cases present further challenges for members of the multidisciplinary team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.