Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28174266›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Low escape-rate genome safeguards with minimal molecular perturbation of

Neta Agmon, Zuojian Tang, Kun Yang, Ben Sutter, Shigehito Ikushima, Yizhi Cai, Katrina Caravelli, James A Martin, Xiaoji Sun, Woo Jin Choi and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Biocontainment efficacy redefined.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Secure biosystems design inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biosensing in Smart Engineered Probiotics.Biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Neta AgmonInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Zuojian TangInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Kun YangSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Ben SutterDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9038.
Shigehito IkushimaInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Yizhi CaiSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Katrina CaravelliSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
James A MartinInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Xiaoji SunInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Woo Jin ChoiSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Allen ZhangSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Giovanni StracquadanioSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Haiping HaoSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Benjamin P TuDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9038.
David FenyoInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Joel S BaderSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Jef D BoekeInstitute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016; jef.boeke@nyumc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-4946
Johns Hopkins University · USNYU Langone Health · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USKirin (Japan) · JPUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of synthetic biology both in industry and in academia grows, there is an increasing need to ensure biocontainment. There is growing interest in engineering bacterial- and yeast-based safeguard (SG) strains. First-generation SGs were based on metabolic auxotrophy; however, the risk of cross-feeding and the cost of growth-controlling nutrients led researchers to look for other avenues. Recent strategies include bacteria engineered to be dependent on nonnatural amino acids and yeast SG strains that have both transcriptional- and recombinational-based biocontainment. We describe improving yeast

Indexed as

Genes, EssentialGenomeMetabolic EngineeringPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologyTerminator Regions, GeneticTranscription, Geneticescape mutantsgenome safetyhistone deacetylaseRpd3Lyeast

Identifiers

PMID28174266
PMCPMC5338387
OpenAlexW2587260132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.