Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28174037›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2017

Observed infant food cue responsivity: Associations with maternal report of infant eating behavior, breastfeeding, and infant weight gain.

Elizabeth Buvinger, Katherine Rosenblum, Alison L Miller, Niko A Kaciroti, Julie C Lumeng

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Prospective relations between maternal emotional eating, feeding to soothe, and infant appetitive behaviors.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth BuvingerCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Katherine RosenblumCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Alison L MillerCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Niko A KacirotiCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Julie C LumengCenter for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: jlumeng@umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USMichigan Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
The Development of Eating Behavior in Infancy: Associations with Behavior, Diet, and Growth to Age 6 yearsR01HD084163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C · 2015 to 2024
$6.3M
Postdoc Stipend Supplement: Developmental Origins of Metabolic Disorders T32T32DK071212 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON, Kanakadurga Singer · 2005 to 2026
$5.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084163NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK071212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant obesity and the rate of weight gain during infancy are significant public health concerns, but few studies have examined eating behaviors in infancy. Food cue responsivity has been described as a key contributor to obesity risk in school age children and adults, but has been rarely examined during infancy. The purpose of the current study was to test among 30 infants aged 6-12 months the hypotheses that infants would show greater interest in food versus non-food stimuli, and that greater birth weight, greater rate of weight gain during infancy, greater mother-reported food responsiveness, being formula versus breastmilk fed, and higher maternal body mass index, would each be associated with greater interest in the food versus non-food stimulus. Results showed that overall infants showed a preference for the food versus non-food stimulus. Preference for the food versus non-food stimulus was predicted by greater infant rate of weight gain since birth, greater maternal-reported infant food responsiveness, and having been exclusively formula-fed, but not by any other factor tested. Results are discussed with regard to theoretical implications for the study of infant obesity and applied prevention implications.

Indexed as

CuesFoodInfant BehaviorWeight GainAdultAttentionBirth WeightBody Mass IndexBottle FeedingBreast FeedingEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant FoodEating behaviorsInfancy

Identifiers

PMID28174037
PMCPMC5363271
OpenAlexW2585919669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.