Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173877›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2017

Bilateral ovarian micrometastatic adenocarcinoma upon prophylactic oophorectomy concurrent with low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Robin Irons, Erin McIntosh, Alexandre Hageboutros, David Warshal, Steven McClane

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin IronsDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Three Cooper Plaza, Suite 403, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA. irons-robin@cooperhealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5037-0470
Erin McIntoshDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Three Cooper Plaza, Suite 403, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Alexandre HageboutrosDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Three Cooper Plaza, Suite 403, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
David WarshalDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Three Cooper Plaza, Suite 403, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Steven McClaneDepartment of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Three Cooper Plaza, Suite 403, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Cooper University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis case report draws attention to the debated role of prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing definitive surgical resection of colon and rectal cancers. It can be challenging to discern the indications and appropriate patient population for this procedure based on the current literature. Potential benefits include treatment and prevention of metastatic disease, preventing development of primary ovarian cancer, and prolonging survival. Negative effects include an increase in operative time and potential morbidity, development of osteoporosis, the risk of cardiac events, and decreasing sexual function. Multiple patient factors such as age, menopausal status, patient preference, presence of hereditary conditions, exposure to radiation, site, and stage of disease should be considered. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case in which a premenopausal 49-year-old female underwent a prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy concurrently with a low anterior resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for clinical stage III rectal cancer. On pathologic examination, resection margins and all 14 lymph nodes harvested were negative for malignancy. Interestingly, she was found to have micrometastatic adenocarcinoma in the bilateral ovaries which had appeared grossly normal at the time of surgery.

conclusionsAfter consideration of the current literature, patient preference, and our clinical judgment, our patient ultimately had a therapeutic effect after undergoing prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy concurrently with a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The addition of prophylactic oophorectomy in a select population, specifically women 50 years of age or younger and/or women who are in the premenopausal state, may carry a survival benefit in the setting of definitive surgical resection of colon and rectal cancers.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPremenopausePrognosisRectal NeoplasmsColorectal cancerMetastasisOophorectomyOvarian cancerProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID28173877
PMCPMC5297189
OpenAlexW2586116089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.