Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173819›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2017

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: association of circumferential myocardial strain and mortality.

Tarique Al Musa, Akhlaque Uddin, Peter P Swoboda, Timothy A Fairbairn, Laura E Dobson, Anvesha Singh, Pankaj Garg, Christopher D Steadman, Bara Erhayiem, Ananth Kidambi and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cardiac structural changes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Establishment of Cardiac Laterality.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cardiac MRI Assessment of Mouse Myocardial Infarction and Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tarique Al MusaMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Akhlaque UddinMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Peter P SwobodaMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Timothy A FairbairnMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Laura E DobsonMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Anvesha SinghDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Pankaj GargMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Christopher D SteadmanDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Bara ErhayiemMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Ananth KidambiMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
David P RipleyMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Adam K McDiarmidMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Philip HaafMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Daniel J BlackmanLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Sven PleinMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Gerald P McCannDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, and the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
John P GreenwoodMultidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & The Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. j.greenwood@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/126/29321Department of Health CDF-2014-07-045Department of Health PDF-2011-04-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown whether circumferential strain is associated with prognosis after treatment of aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to characterise strain in severe AS, using myocardial tagging cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), prior to and following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR), and determine whether abnormalities in strain were associated with outcome.

methodsCMR was performed pre- and 6 m post-intervention in 98 patients (52 TAVI, 46 SAVR; 77 ± 8 years) with severe AS. TAVI patients were older (80.9 ± 6.4 vs. 73.0 ± 7.0 years, p < 0.01) with a higher STS score (2.06 ± 0.6 vs. 6.03 ± 3.4, p < 0.001). Tagged cine images were acquired at the basal, mid and apical LV levels with a complementary spatial modulation of magnetization (CSPAMM) pulse sequence. Circumferential strain, strain rate and rotation were calculated using inTag© software.

resultsNo significant change in basal or mid LV circumferential strain, or of diastolic strain rate, was seen following either intervention. However, a significant and comparable decline in LV torsion and twist was observed (SAVR: torsion 14.08 ± 8.40 vs. 7.81 ± 4.51, p < 0.001, twist 16.17 ± 7.01 vs.12.45 ± 4.78, p < 0.01; TAVI: torsion 14.43 ± 4.66 vs. 11.20 ± 4.62, p < 0.001, twist 16.08 ± 5.36 vs. 12.36 ± 5.21, p < 0.001) which likely reflects an improvement towards normal physiology following relief of AS. Over a maximum 6.0y follow up, there were 23 (16%) deaths following valve intervention. On multivariable Cox analysis, baseline mid LV circumferential strain was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 1.01-1.05; p = 0.009) independent of age, LV ejection fraction and STS mortality risk score. ROC analysis indicated a mid LV circumferential strain > -18.7% was associated with significantly reduced survival.

conclusionTAVI and SAVR procedures are associated with comparable declines in rotational LV mechanics at 6 m, with largely unchanged strain and strain rates. Pre-operative peak mid LV circumferential strain is associated with post-operative mortality.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial ContractionVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisArea Under CurveBiomechanical PhenomenaChi-Square DistributionEnglandFemaleHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAortic stenosisAortic valve replacementMyocardial tissue taggingTranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID28173819
PMCPMC5297161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.