Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28173773›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2017

Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of therapy-related colorectal cancer: study design.

Lisanne S Rigter, Manon C W Spaander, Leon M Moons, Tanya M Bisseling, Berthe M P Aleman, Jan Paul de Boer, Pieternella J Lugtenburg, Cecile P M Janus, Eefke J Petersen, Judith M Roesink and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinicopathological features and risk factors for developing colorectal neoplasia in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lisanne S RigterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Manon C W SpaanderDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leon M MoonsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tanya M BisselingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Berthe M P AlemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Paul de BoerDepartment of Hematology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieternella J LugtenburgDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cecile P M JanusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eefke J PetersenDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith M RoesinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John M M RaemaekersDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Richard W M van der MaazenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Annemieke CatsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Eveline M A BleikerDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Petur SnaebjornssonDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Beatriz CarvalhoDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Katarzyna JóźwiakDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hein Te RieleDivision of Biological Stress Response, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerrit A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique E van LeerdamDepartment of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands. m.v.leerdam@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLErasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLOncode Institute · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecond primary malignancies are a major cause of excess morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Hodgkin lymphoma survivors who were treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or high-dose procarbazine have an increased risk to develop colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy surveillance plays an important role in colorectal cancer prevention by removal of the precursor lesions (adenomas) and early detection of cancer, resulting in improved survival rates. Therefore, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or high-dose procarbazine could benefit from colonoscopy, or other surveillance modalities, which are expected to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Current knowledge on clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of therapy-related colorectal cancer is limited. The pathogenesis of such colorectal cancers might be different from the pathogenesis in the general population and therefore these patients might require a different clinical approach. We designed a study with the primary aim to assess the diagnostic yield of a first surveillance colonoscopy among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of colorectal cancer and to compare these results with different screening modalities in the general population. Secondary aims include assessment of the test characteristics of stool tests and evaluation of burden, acceptance and satisfaction of CRC surveillance through two questionnaires. METHODS/

designThis prospective multicenter cohort study will include Hodgkin lymphoma survivors who survived ≥8 years after treatment with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or procarbazine (planned inclusion of 259 participants). Study procedures will consist of a surveillance colonoscopy with removal of precursor lesions (adenomas) and 6-8 normal colonic tissue biopsies, a fecal immunochemical test and a stool DNA test. All neoplastic lesions encountered will be classified using relevant histomorphological, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses in order to obtain more insight into colorectal carcinogenesis in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. The Miscan-model will be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. DISCUSSION: Evaluation of the diagnostic performance, patient acceptance and burden of colorectal cancer surveillance is necessary for future implementation of an individualized colorectal cancer surveillance program for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. In addition, more insight into treatment-induced colorectal carcinogenesis will provide the first step towards prevention and personalized treatment. This information may be extrapolated to other groups of cancer survivors.

trial registrationRegistered at the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR): NTR4961 .

Indexed as

Research DesignAdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic ProtocolsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmEarly Detection of CancerFecesHodgkin DiseaseHumansImmunochemistryAntineoplastic AgentsDNA, NeoplasmProcarbazineCarcinogenesisColonoscopyColorectal neoplasiaHodgkin lymphomaStool (DNA) testSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID28173773
PMCPMC5297162
OpenAlexW2587471612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.